Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morris, 741 P.2d 246.

110 citing documents.

Waddell v. Titan Ins. Co., Inc. 88 P.3d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Waddell v. Titan Ins. Co., Inc. 88 P.3d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Auto Ass’n v. Morris, , or Damron/Morris agreements as in Himes v. Safeway Ins.
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 83 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 83 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Auto Ass’n v. Morris, , to refer to any agreement between a third-party claimant and insured whereby the insured consents in any fashion to liability and enters into an agreement providing the third-party claimant with the insured’s breach of contract and bad faith claims against the insurer in exchange for a covenant
Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney 83 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2004
Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney 83 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2004
Himes v. Safeway Insurance 66 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Himes v. Safeway Insurance 66 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Auto Ass’n v. Morris, , to refer to any agreement between a third-party claimant and insured whereby the insured consents in any fashion to liability and enters into an agreement providing the third-party claimant with the insured’s breach of contract and bad faith claims against the insurer in exchange for a covenant
Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney 58 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney 58 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America 36 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America 36 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Manterola v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 30 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Manterola v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 30 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 21 P.3d 395 Ariz. 2001
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 21 P.3d 395 Ariz. 2001
(holding that, when an insurer has denied coverage, a settlement agreement between the insured and claimant is not a breach of an insurance contract’s cooperation clause if the settlement is fair and reasonable, non-collusive and not fraudulent, and does not bind an insurer to any of th
Leal v. Allstate Insurance 17 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Leal v. Allstate Insurance 17 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
But, unlike an insured who owes reciprocal duties of cooperation to an insurer, United Services Automobile Ass’n v. Morris, , (when insurer defends insured, latter must cooperate and aid in the defense), the Leals did not give up control of the settlement of their claim nor of their freedom of action.
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 998 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 998 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Munzer v. Feola 985 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Munzer v. Feola 985 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
In general terms, a Morris agreement, first approved in the ease of United Services Automobile Ass’n v. Morris, , allows a plaintiff and defendant, whose insurer will only defend under a reservation of rights, to agree that judgment may be entered against the defendant in a specified amount with the understanding that the plaintiff will not execute on the judgment against the defendant.
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 941 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 941 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ass’n v. Morris, , State Farm Mut.
Ogden v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 933 P.2d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Ogden v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 933 P.2d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Valenzuela v. Brown 919 P.2d 1376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Valenzuela v. Brown 919 P.2d 1376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
v. Morris, , citing Damron; cf. Arizona Property & Casualty Ins.
Smith v. Tucson Airport Authority 882 P.2d 1291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Smith v. Tucson Airport Authority 882 P.2d 1291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Because we believe this ruling violates United Services Automobile Ass’n v. Morris, , we reverse.
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 867 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1994
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 867 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1994
Having heard argument, and reviewed the record, briefs, and memoranda, the Court notes that, at oral argument, Plaintiffs concede that on remand Defendant is entitled to a , notwithstanding language to the contrary in the Court of Appeals’ opinion.
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 852 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 852 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ass’n v. Morris, , involving a tort action that was settled when the insureds under a homeowner’s policy stipulated to a judgment to be collected solely from the insurer in return for a covenant not to execute against the insureds.
H.B.H. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 823 P.2d 1332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
H.B.H. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 823 P.2d 1332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
To support this proposition, appellees point to the Arizona Supreme Court’s
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Ass’n v. Morris, , Farmers Ins.