Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz., 755 P.2d 1135.
-
Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co.
842 P.2d 1355
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
W. Prosser and P. Keeton, The Law of Torts, § 67, at 470 (5th Ed.1984).
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
- Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
-
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell
790 P.2d 242
Ariz. 1990
Mark Lighting Fixture v. General Elec.
- Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
-
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp.
774 P.2d 213
Ariz. 1989
In determining whether to apply a decision retroactively, , (supplemental opinion): (1) whether the opinion establishes a new legal principle by overruling clear and reliable precedent or by deciding an issue whose resolution was not foreshadowed; (2) whether retroactive application would adversely affect the purpose behind the new rule; and (
- Baker v. Gardner 770 P.2d 766 Ariz. 1989
- Warfel v. Cheney 758 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Warfel v. Cheney 758 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel Board 766 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
-
Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel Board
766 P.2d 608
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
The Chevron criteria for limiting a , : 1.