Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Herder, 751 P.2d 519.

32 citing documents.

Jangula v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 88 P.3d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Jangula v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 88 P.3d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
¶ 1 In 1988 the Arizona Supreme Court interpreted Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 20-673(C) in Arizona Property &amp
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
As we recognized in [Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund u] Herder, [ , ] however, the rights and obligations of an insolvent insurer and the Fund are not absolutely coextensive but are limited by the statute.
State v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 966 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. AZ. PROPERTY & CAS. INS. 966 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. AZ. PROPERTY & CAS. INS. 966 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 966 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
Plaintiffs recovery from the Fund was not subject to an offset based on a single policy limit.
Medica, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. 566 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1997
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Betancourt, 170 Ariz. at 298 , 823 P.2d at 1306 .
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Betancourt, 170 Ariz. at 298 , 823 P.2d at 1306 .
Ah v. Arizona Prop. and Cas. Ins. Guar. 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ah v. Arizona Prop. and Cas. Ins. Guar. 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Medica, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. 550 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(UM reducing clause applies only to payments made by tortfeasor); Spain v. Valley Forge Ins.
Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund 823 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund 823 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Arizona Property & , Arizona Property &amp
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1990
Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1990
Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 788 P.2d 56 Ariz. 1989
Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 788 P.2d 56 Ariz. 1989
Croci v. Travelers Insurance 781 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Croci v. Travelers Insurance 781 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
] [2] case, , [1986], , it is clear that the law in Arizona does not invalidate the type of language contained in the Travelers policy exce