DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 783 P.2d 781.

66 citing documents.

  • Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
  • Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
    ¶43 “‘To be defamatory, a publication must be false and must bring the defamed person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or must impeach plaintiff’s honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.’” -04, -89 (1993), quoting Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
  • Chilton v. Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. 148 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
  • Chilton v. Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. 148 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
    ¶17 “To be defamatory, a publication must be false and must bring the defamed person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or must impeach plaintiff’s honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.” Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
  • Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
    Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., , ("A defamation action compensates damage to reputation or good name caused by the publication of false information.") (citing Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 , 384 n. 9, 87 S.Ct.
  • Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
    See Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
  • Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police Department 969 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
  • Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police Department 969 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
    Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., , does not support Bolm’s broad assertion that TPD and its officers “have no right of privacy in their performance evaluations and internal affairs records.” That contention and Bolm’s argument that police privacy interests extend only to information specifically exempt from disclosure under A.R.S
  • Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    560 , overruled by Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
  • Lewis v. Oliver 873 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • Lewis v. Oliver 873 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    See, , Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., , , cf. Angel v. Ward, 258 S.E.2d at 791 (IRS agent was a public official).
  • Turner v. Devlin 848 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1993
  • Turner v. Devlin 848 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1993
    DISCUSSION A. Actionability “To be defamatory, a publication must be false and must bring the defamed *204 person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or must impeach plaintiffs honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.” Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.