Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Dean v. Dolny, 778 P.2d 1193.

56 citing documents.

State v. Wauneka Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wauneka Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Odette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Odette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
see also United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630-31 (2002) (noting defects in an indictment are not “jurisdictional” and do not deprive a court of its power to adjudicate a case).
State v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
abrogated on other grounds, State ex rel.
State v. Winegardner 397 P.3d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Winegardner 397 P.3d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
300 n.3, , 1196 n.3 (1989), , ¶ 23 & n.8, , 163-64 & n.8 (2006).
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Denham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Denham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Leacock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Leacock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Soto 224 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Soto 224 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
and Rothweiler v. Superior Court (City of Tucson), , ).
Derendal v. Griffith 104 P.3d 147 Ariz. 2005
Derendal v. Griffith 104 P.3d 147 Ariz. 2005
Derendal v. Griffith 83 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Derendal v. Griffith 83 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Raye v. Jones 76 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Raye v. Jones 76 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
the offense of underage drinking and driving does not meet the test for jury eligibility.
State v. Ring 65 P.3d 915 Ariz. 2003
State v. Ring 65 P.3d 915 Ariz. 2003
require a jury trial even though they are punishable by less than six months in jail.
State v. Anderson 16 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Anderson 16 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Benitez v. Dunevant 7 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2000
Benitez v. Dunevant 7 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2000
Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court 988 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court 988 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Benitez v. Dunevant 979 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Benitez v. Dunevant 979 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Amancio v. Forster 993 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Amancio v. Forster 993 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
the state charged the defendant with possession of marijuana, a class 6 felony, but the prosecutor designated the offense a misdemeanor.
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Strohson 945 P.2d 1251 Ariz. 1997
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Strohson 945 P.2d 1251 Ariz. 1997
Campbell v. Superior Court 924 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Campbell v. Superior Court 924 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
300 n. 3, , 1196 n. 3 (1989) (citing Ariz.R.S.Ct.
Frederickson v. Superior Court 928 P.2d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Frederickson v. Superior Court 928 P.2d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
300 n. 3, , 1196 n. 3 (1989), cert.
Schillerstrom v. State 885 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Schillerstrom v. State 885 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
300 n. 3, , 1196 n. 3 (1989), cert.
State v. Miller 836 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Miller 836 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992