Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Jepson v. New, 792 P.2d 728.
- Maher v. Urman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
- Maher v. Urman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
- State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 69 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 69 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Kosman v. State 16 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-
Kosman v. State
16 P.3d 211
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(referring to criteria to be considered when determining if equitable tolling should apply).
- BCAZ Corp. v. Helgoe 976 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- BCAZ Corp. v. Helgoe 976 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- McKernan v. Dupont 968 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- McKernan v. Dupont 968 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Johnson v. Elson 967 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Johnson v. Elson
967 P.2d 1022
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
C. Interpretation of Rule 60(c)(1) ¶ 15 Defendant argues that, even if Rule 60(e)(1) applies, , requires more than just “surprise” or “excusable neglect.” In Jepson , the court held that *490 Plaintiff could not obtain relief under Rule 60(c)(1) unless he 1) showed mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; 2) requested relief promptly; and 3) had a meritorious claim or defense
- Safeway Insurance v. Collins 963 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Safeway Insurance v. Collins 963 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Curtis v. Morris 909 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Curtis v. Morris
909 P.2d 460
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
“We are reluctant to divide this court on an issue where the trial courts need definitive guidance.” , vacated in part
- Copeland v. ARIZONA VET. MEM. COLISEUM 859 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Copeland v. ARIZONA VET. MEM. COLISEUM
859 P.2d 196
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
*89 The court requests plaintiff to indicate what diligent prosecution the plaintiff was making of his case pursuant to Rule V(e), Uniform Rules of Practice, and discuss his motion to set aside judgment in view of Jepson v. New, [ , ].
- Mission Insurance v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross 822 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Mission Insurance v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross 822 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Perry v. County of Maricopa 808 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- Perry v. County of Maricopa 808 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- White v. Lewis 804 P.2d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990