Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson, 782 P.2d 727.

93 citing documents.

National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 975 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 975 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
see also Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Cos. Co.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & Roca 902 P.2d 1354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & Roca 902 P.2d 1354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-58 , -34 (1989); Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Ins.
Canon Sch. Dist. v. WES CONSTR. CO. IV 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon Sch. Dist. v. WES CONSTR. CO. IV 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Midland Risk Management Co. v. Watford 876 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Midland Risk Management Co. v. Watford 876 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 865 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1993
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 865 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1993
Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 857 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 857 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
“the rule in Arizona is that we construe a clause subject to different interpretations by examining the language of the clause, public policy considerations, and the purpose of the transaction as a whole.” Using this rule of construction, we begin by examining the language of the claus
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 854 P.2d 1134 Ariz. 1993
Criticized Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 854 P.2d 1134 Ariz. 1993
(recognizing the lack of logic in requiring ambiguity, which may be fortuitous, to prove the true terms of an agreement); Darner, 140 Ariz. at 389 , 682 P.2d at 394 (same).
Valley National Bank v. Insurance Co. of North America 836 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Valley National Bank v. Insurance Co. of North America 836 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
-54 , -30 (1989) (discussing history and objectives of UIM legislation); Spain, 152 Ariz. at 191-94 , 731 P.2d at 86-89 (discussing history and purpose of UM legislation).
Uhrhammer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 808 P.2d 1260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Uhrhammer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 808 P.2d 1260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
: Insurers must comply with statutes governing automobile insurance in providing UM [uninsured motorist] and UIM coverage.
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
(all statutes relating to insurance contracts in effect become part of the contract).
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 804 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1990
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 804 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1990
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 796 P.2d 915 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 796 P.2d 915 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1990
Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1990
(describing statutory evolution).
Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 788 P.2d 56 Ariz. 1989
Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 788 P.2d 56 Ariz. 1989
(all statutes relating to insurance contracts in effect become part of the contract).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Duran 785 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Duran 785 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1989
Laws 1981, ch. 224, § 1; , (discussing the legislative development of UIM).