Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 788 P.2d 56.

44 citing documents.

State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando Ariz. 2025
State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando Ariz. 2025
Co., n.6 (1989) (noting that UM and UIM coverage share the same policy considerations).
State Farm v. Orlando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State Farm v. Orlando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Hanfelder v. GEICO Indem. Co. 422 P.3d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hanfelder v. GEICO Indem. Co. 422 P.3d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. , , 328, , 61 (1989) ("Implicit in the nature of the UIM transaction ...
Frank and Bettina Gambrell v. Ids Property Casualty Insurance Co. 357 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Frank and Bettina Gambrell v. Ids Property Casualty Insurance Co. 357 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Co., (overruling one case); Calvert, 144 Ariz. at 297, 697 P.2d at 690 (overruling three cases).
Beaver v. American Family Mutual Insurance 324 P.3d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beaver v. American Family Mutual Insurance 324 P.3d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co., n.6, n.6 (1989) (citation omitted).
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Sharp 277 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2012
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Sharp 277 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2012
Co., cf. Rashid, 163 Ariz. at 273, 787 P.2d at 1069 (“‘A premium has been paid for each of the coverages .
Hamill v. Mid-Century Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Hamill v. Mid-Century Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
Co., (“excess/escape” and “prorata limit reduction” clauses); Higgins v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 145 P.3d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 145 P.3d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Co., , 788 P.2d *315 56, 60 (1989); Spain, 152 Ariz. at 193 , 731 P.2d at 88 .
Country Mutual Insurance v. Fonk 7 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Country Mutual Insurance v. Fonk 7 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Co., , (citing State Farm Mut.
Taylor v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America 992 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Taylor v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America 992 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Co., (quoting Higgins v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Co., 329 , 62 (1989)(allowing recovery “to the extent [the] actual damages are not fully compensated” when the parties stipulated that damages in the wrongful death claim exceeded the combined amounts of liability and UIM coverages of the applicable policies); Rashid v. State Farm Mut.
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
Co., , (coverage dispute involving interpretation of § 20-259.01).
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co., , (excess/escape clause and pro rata limit reduction clause void as to UIM coverage); *426 State Farm Mut.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co., , as support for their assertion that "other vehicle” clauses are invalid and cannot be used to trigger the statutory limitation on stacking.
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co., , (motor vehicle policies; other insurance clauses may be used to prevent double recovery, but not to prevent recovery of actual damages).
Giannini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 837 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Giannini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 837 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Co., , Spain, 152 Ariz. at 194 , 731 P.2d at 89 .
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
Co., , (public policy mandates UIM be recoverable in addition to liability to the extent of actual damages).
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 796 P.2d 915 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 796 P.2d 915 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1990
Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1990
Co., , (citing State Farm Mut.