Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 787 P.2d 1066.

32 citing documents.

Kay Franklin v. Csaa General Insurance Ariz. 2023
Kay Franklin v. Csaa General Insurance Ariz. 2023
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Sharp 277 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2012
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Sharp 277 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2012
Co., n.2, n.2 (1990) (noting that under the UMA, stacking may be prohibited “when an insured has purchased multiple coverages from one insurer against the same event and seeks to stack the limits provided by any single coverage”).
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 145 P.3d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 145 P.3d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
¶ 19 Further, 276 , 1072 (1990), the court invalidated a policy’s other insurance escape clause for excess coverage that would have permitted the plaintiff passenger’s insurer to avoid paying an uninsured motorist claim because another insurer for the host vehicle had already paid uninsured motorist cover
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Co., 276 , 1072 (1990)(escape clause in UM policy provision unenforceable to reduce recovery below actual damages when injured passenger’s damages exceeded the UM coverage limits of the applicable primary carrier); State Farm Mut.
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
American States Insurance v. C & G Contracting, Inc. 924 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co., , (“other insurance” clause partially void as to UM coverage); Brown v. State Farm Mut.
Terry v. Auto-Owners Insurance 908 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Terry v. Auto-Owners Insurance 908 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co., , 273 n. 3, , 1070 n. 3 (1990)).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insuarnce v. Lindsey 897 P.2d 631 Ariz. 1995
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insuarnce v. Lindsey 897 P.2d 631 Ariz. 1995
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co., , and Brown v. State Farm Mut.
Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
Giannini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 837 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Giannini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 837 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
the plaintiff was injured by a negligent uninsured motorist while he was a passenger in a car driven by a non-negligent driver.
Alcala v. Mid-Century Insurance 828 P.2d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Alcala v. Mid-Century Insurance 828 P.2d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Co., , where the Arizona Supreme Court stated: The UM and UIM statutes do not contain exceptions for the myriad of fine print exclusions, exceptions, excess and escape provisions that in previous years provided opportunities for both the finely sharpened quill of the ingenious draftsman and
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
Co., , 273 n. 3, , 1069 n. 3 (1990).
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies 805 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1991
Co., , 272-73 n. 2, , 1068-69 n. 2 (1990).
Croci v. Travelers Insurance 788 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1990
Croci v. Travelers Insurance 788 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1990