Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, 804 P.2d 730.

497 citing documents.

Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L. 225 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Action No. JS-500274, , (A parent’s constitutional rights to parent his child “can be overridden only by the combined elements of statutorily defined improper behavior by the parent and the child’s best interests.”).
LINDA v. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC. 117 P.3d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
LINDA v. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC. 117 P.3d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Action No. JS-500274, , it is not absolute.
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Action No. JS-500274, , (quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
In Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, we held that the “best interests of the child are a necessary, but not exclusively sufficient, condition for an order of termination.” 167 Ariz. 1, 5
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O. 100 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O. 100 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Jennifer B., 189 Ariz. at 557; see also In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
See also In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
These fundamental rights do “ ‘not evaporate simply because’ the natural parents ‘have not been model parents or have lost temporary custody of their child to the state.’ ” In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, , quoting Santosky, 455 U.S. at 753 , 102 S.Ct.
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 995 P.2d 682 Ariz. 2000
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 995 P.2d 682 Ariz. 2000
“This court and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized that the right to the control and custody of one’s children is a fundamental one.” In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, , (Action No. JS-500274.).
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 979 P.2d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 979 P.2d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Indeed, severance “is a serious matter and courts should bend over backwards, if possible, to maintain the natural ties of birth.” Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, , (citing Anonymous v. Anonymous, 25 Ariz.App.
Don L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 975 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Don L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 975 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982); Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, , Pima County, Juvenile Action No. J-46735 v. Howard
Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 971 P.2d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 971 P.2d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Action No. JS-500274, -5 , -34 (1990).
James S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 972 P.2d 684 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
James S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 972 P.2d 684 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Jennifer B. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 944 P.2d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Jennifer B. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 944 P.2d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Action No. JS-500274, -7 , -36 (1990)(best interests of the child in severance proceedings).
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-120171 905 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-120171 905 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Cf. Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
See, e.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500271, -5 , -34 (1990); Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-1147, , (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct.
Matter of Juvenile Action No. JS-8490 876 P.2d 1137 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Juvenile Action No. JS-8490 876 P.2d 1137 Ariz. 1994
In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274
Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Pima Cty. Juv. Severance Action 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, , (emphasis added).
Matter of Pima Cty. Juv. Severance Action 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, , (emphasis added).
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568 869 P.2d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568 869 P.2d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487 881 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487 881 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Action No. JS-500274, [ ,] at 733.
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441 857 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441 857 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JA 33794 828 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JA 33794 828 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9956 818 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9956 818 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, e.g., Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, , (while “the best interests of the child alone may not be sufficient to grant termination, they may be sufficient to deny termination”).