Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Orme School v. Reeves, 802 P.2d 1000.

1312 citing documents.

Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
v. Reeves, , Ariz. R. Civ.
Stanley v. McCarver 92 P.3d 849 Ariz. 2004
Stanley v. McCarver 92 P.3d 849 Ariz. 2004
v. Reeves, -10 , -09 (1990)).
Crackel v. Allstate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Crackel v. Allstate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District 92 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District 92 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
v. Reeves, P.2d 1000 (1990).
Bennett v. Brownlow 90 P.3d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Bennett v. Brownlow 90 P.3d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Bridgestone Firestone North America Tire v. A.P.S. Rent a Car & Leasing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Bridgestone Firestone North America Tire v. A.P.S. Rent a Car & Leasing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
v. Reeves, P.2d 1000 (1990).
Reinke v. Alliance Towing 88 P.3d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Reinke v. Alliance Towing 88 P.3d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
v. Reeves, P.2d 1000 (1990).
Mullenaux v. Graham County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mullenaux v. Graham County 82 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mullenaux v. Graham County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
v. Reeves, 166 Ariz. 301, 309
Mullenaux v. Graham County 82 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. Naranjo 79 P.3d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. Naranjo 79 P.3d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Wolfinger v. Cheche 80 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Wolfinger v. Cheche 80 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Brake Masters Systems, Inc. v. Gabbay 78 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Brake Masters Systems, Inc. v. Gabbay 78 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Valley Farms v. Transcontinental Ins. Cna Casualty of California Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Valley Farms v. Transcontinental Ins. Cna Casualty of California Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Decca Design Build, Inc. v. American Automobile Insurance 77 P.3d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Decca Design Build, Inc. v. American Automobile Insurance 77 P.3d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 7 Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact, , and “only when one inference can be drawn from the undisputed facts, and those facts show that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Mohave Elec.
Lindsay v. Cave Creek Outfitters, L.L.C. 88 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Lindsay v. Cave Creek Outfitters, L.L.C. 88 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Teeters & Assoc., , , (“[T]he trial judge will not weigh evidence or determine questions of credibility, will not draw an inference where conflicting inferences are possible, and will defer to the jury on all disputed material facts.”).
Torrez v. Knowlton Dupnik Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Torrez v. Knowlton Dupnik Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
v. Reeves, P.2d 1000 (1990).
Pleak v. Entrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Pleak v. Entrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Armenta v. City of Casa Grande 71 P.3d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Armenta v. City of Casa Grande 71 P.3d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Summary judgment should be granted “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”
Andrews v. Blake 69 P.3d 7 Ariz. 2003
Andrews v. Blake 69 P.3d 7 Ariz. 2003
Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of Flagstaff 66 P.3d 44 Ariz. 2003
Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of Flagstaff 66 P.3d 44 Ariz. 2003
v. Reeves, -10 , -09 (1990) (subscribing to the views of Justice White in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct.
Demko v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 65 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Demko v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 65 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Samsel v. Allstate Insurance 59 P.3d 281 Ariz. 2002