Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Orme School v. Reeves, 802 P.2d 1000.

1307 citing documents.

Doe v. Roe 931 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Sanchez v. City of Tucson 943 P.2d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Sanchez v. City of Tucson 943 P.2d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Willamette Crushing Co. v. State 932 P.2d 1350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Willamette Crushing Co. v. State 932 P.2d 1350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ah v. Arizona Prop. and Cas. Ins. Guar. 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ah v. Arizona Prop. and Cas. Ins. Guar. 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Estate of Hernandez v. Flavio 930 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1997
Estate of Hernandez v. Flavio 930 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Randall v. Alvarado-Wells 928 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Randall v. Alvarado-Wells 928 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Logerquist v. Danforth 932 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Logerquist v. Danforth 932 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Nestle Ice Cream Co. v. Fuller 924 P.2d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Nestle Ice Cream Co. v. Fuller 924 P.2d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Phipps v. CW Leasing, Inc. 923 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Phipps v. CW Leasing, Inc. 923 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Adams 931 P.2d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Adams 931 P.2d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Summary judgment is appropriate where “the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”
Florez v. Sargeant 917 P.2d 250 Ariz. 1996
Florez v. Sargeant 917 P.2d 250 Ariz. 1996
Enos Psychological Report at 6; , (affidavits that are internally inconsistent are insufficient to withstand a motion for summary judgment).
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 917 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1996
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 917 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1996
A directed verdict is appropriate if “the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. Bentley 928 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. Bentley 928 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon 927 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon 927 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State Ex Rel. Fox v. New Phoenix Auto Auction, Ltd. 916 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State Ex Rel. Fox v. New Phoenix Auto Auction, Ltd. 916 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McDaniel v. Troy Design Services Co. 925 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McDaniel v. Troy Design Services Co. 925 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
MacCollum v. Perkinson 913 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
MacCollum v. Perkinson 913 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Galati v. Lake Havasu City 920 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Galati v. Lake Havasu City 920 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 907 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995