Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court, 789 P.2d 180.

36 citing documents.

State v. O'DELL 46 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. O'DELL 46 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Guthrie v. Jones 43 P.3d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Guthrie v. Jones 43 P.3d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
MacK v. Cruikshank 2 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
MacK v. Cruikshank 2 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
to requiring that the second sample be “reasonably reliable,” , to holding that offering a suspect a choice between a duplicate breath test with no sample preserved and a blood test with a preserved sample meets due process requirements, , to upholding as constitutional the amendment to the DUI statute permitting the state to administer replicate breath tests without preserving a sample
State v. Sanchez 967 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Sanchez 967 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
In State ex reí , our supreme court reviewed the history of breath testing and its reliability.
Diaz v. Arizona Department of Transportation 918 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Diaz v. Arizona Department of Transportation 918 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(in criminal prosecution, police not required to inform subject of the consequences to his defense position at trial of a failure to request a preserved breath sample) , (in driver’s license suspension case, police not required to inform su
State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAI 878 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAI 878 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Norris, however, , , require the police to inform DUI suspects of their right to an independent test.
Valenzuela v. Cowan 877 P.2d 1342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Valenzuela v. Cowan 877 P.2d 1342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Johnson 891 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Johnson 891 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Moss v. Superior Court 857 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Moss v. Superior Court 857 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Vannoy 866 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Vannoy 866 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Edwards v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP. 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Edwards v. Arizona Department of Transportation/Motor Vehicle Division 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Edwards v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP. 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Edwards v. Arizona Department of Transportation/Motor Vehicle Division 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Moreno 844 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Moreno 844 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Rodriguez 844 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Rodriguez 844 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
511 n. 2, , 181 n. 2 (1990).
State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
(independent breath samples need not be provided to defendant if the police use replicate breath testing).
State v. Kemp 813 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1991
State v. Kemp 813 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stuart 811 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Stuart 811 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Velasco 799 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1990
State v. Velasco 799 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1990
(due process was not *489 violated where defendant was given choice between replicate breath test with no sample saved and blood test at state expense); see also Oshrin, 142 Ariz. at 113 , 688 P.2d at 1005 .