Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore, 812 P.2d 977.
- State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando Ariz. 2025
-
State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando
Ariz. 2025
Paul Fire & two decisions in which this Court declined to read the FRA and UMA together.
- Murray v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona .... 366 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- Murray v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona .... 366 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc. 336 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc. 336 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Jackson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
-
Jackson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
P.2d 977 (1991), in support of their argument that the BOP provided primary automobile insurance.
- Ballesteros v. American Standard Insurance 222 P.3d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- Ballesteros v. American Standard Insurance 222 P.3d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- Castillo v. Miller's Mutual Fire Insurance 25 P.3d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- Castillo v. Miller's Mutual Fire Insurance 25 P.3d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. INS. v. Continental Cas. 23 P.3d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. INS. v. Continental Cas.
23 P.3d 664
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Paul Fire & , the Arizona Supreme Court discussed the two respects in which insurance may be deemed excess: (1) "true excess" coverage, which provides coverage for a modest premium against catastrophic losses that exceed the limits of the underlying coverage; and (2) when other insureds have purchased insuran
- Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache County 18 P.3d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache County
18 P.3d 713
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
(quoting Kilpa *407 , ).
- Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
-
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America
9 P.3d 1049
Ariz. 2000
(citing Brown, 163 Ariz. at 328 , 788 P.2d at 61 ) (emphasis added).
- Johnson v. Continental Insurance 7 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Johnson v. Continental Insurance 7 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Petrusek v. Farmers Insurance 975 P.2d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Petrusek v. Farmers Insurance
975 P.2d 142
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
*554 (1991) and Ormsbee v. Allstate Ins.
- Tallent v. National General Insurance 903 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Estate of Ball v. American Motorists Insurance 888 P.2d 1311 Ariz. 1995
-
Estate of Ball v. American Motorists Insurance
888 P.2d 1311
Ariz. 1995
v. Gilmore, -66 , -84 (1991)).
- Estate of Ball v. American Motorists Insurance 874 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- Estate of Ball v. American Motorists Insurance 874 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- Ormsbee v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1993
- Ormsbee v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1993
- Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
- Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
- Ormsbee v. Allstate Insurance 825 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
-
Ormsbee v. Allstate Insurance
825 P.2d 944
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Paul Fire & , , (1991), is an umbrella policy exempt from the requirements of A.R.S.