Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dietz v. General Electric Co., 821 P.2d 166.

101 citing documents.

Piner v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa 962 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1998
Piner v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa 962 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1998
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 961 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1998
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 961 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1998
Co., , (discussing the legislative history of UCATA and the right of contribution under the new statutory scheme).
Oaks v. McQuiller 955 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Oaks v. McQuiller 955 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Zuern v. Ford Motor Co. 937 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Zuern v. Ford Motor Co. 937 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Co., , and that designating a nonparty at fault allows defendants “to offer trial evidence of [the nonparty’s] negligence and to argue that the jury should attribute all or some percentage of fault to [the non-party], thereby reducing Defendants’ pereentage of fault and consequent liability.”
Yslava v. Hughes Aircraft Co. 936 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1997
Yslava v. Hughes Aircraft Co. 936 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1997
Co., , (nonemployer defendants allegedly contributing to plaintiffs work-related injuries permitted to name plaintiffs employer as nonparty at fault in personal injury action).
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Rosner v. Denim & Diamonds, Inc. 937 P.2d 353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Co., , 510, , 171 (1991) (emphasis in original).
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Thomas v. First Interstate Bank of Arizona, N.A. 930 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Thomas v. First Interstate Bank of Arizona, N.A. 930 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Co., , the supreme court acknowledged that the legislature specifically enacted § 12-2506 to establish “a system of several liability making each tortfeasor responsible for paying for his or her percentage of fault and no more.” (Emphasis in original).
Zamora v. Reinstein 915 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1996
Zamora v. Reinstein 915 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1996
We also interpret statutes “in such a way as to achieve the general legislative goals that can be adduced from the body of legislation in question.”
Aitken v. Industrial Commission 904 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1995
Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 904 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1995
Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 904 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1995
Aitken v. Industrial Commission 904 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1995
Co., , we held that under A.R.S.
Natseway v. City of Tempe 909 P.2d 441 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Natseway v. City of Tempe 909 P.2d 441 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
PAM TRANSPORT v. Freightliner Corp. 893 P.2d 1295 Ariz. 1995
PAM TRANSPORT v. Freightliner Corp. 893 P.2d 1295 Ariz. 1995
Co., , , 240 n. 2, , 378 n. 2 (1990).
Wareing v. Falk 897 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Wareing v. Falk 897 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Gibbs v. O'Malley Lumber Co. 868 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. Cohen 868 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. Cohen 868 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of Regents 866 P.2d 1330 Ariz. 1994
Co., , 510, , 171 (1991); -76 , -28 (CtApp.
Neil v. Kavena 859 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Neil v. Kavena 859 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
John Deere Insurance v. West American Insurance Group 854 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
John Deere Insurance v. West American Insurance Group 854 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Co., , (“when the text of a statute is capable of more than one construction or result, legislative intent on the specific issue is unas-certainable, and more than one interpretation is plausible, we ordinarily interpret the statute in such a way as to achieve the general legislative goals tha
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Aitken v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 842 P.2d 1313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Aitken v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 842 P.2d 1313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Ocotillo West Joint Venture v. Superior Court 844 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ocotillo West Joint Venture v. Superior Court 844 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co. 842 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co. 842 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
is particularly pertinent in this respect.
Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. v. Schwindt 833 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1992
Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. v. Schwindt 833 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1992
Co., , (court not free to decide case on common law or equitable basis given statutory mandate).
Shelby v. Action Scaffolding, Inc. 827 P.2d 462 Ariz. 1992
Shelby v. Action Scaffolding, Inc. 827 P.2d 462 Ariz. 1992
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 825 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1992