Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Rogers, 815 P.2d 900.

44 citing documents.

Sierra Club v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Sierra Club v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Rogers, (citation omitted).
Stuart v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Stuart v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Johnson v. Queen creek/acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Johnson v. Queen creek/acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lunney v. State 418 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lunney v. State 418 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
American Civil Liberties Union v. Arizona Department of Child Safety 377 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
American Civil Liberties Union v. Arizona Department of Child Safety 377 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Rogers, -39 , -08 (1991)).
McKee v. Peoria Unified School District 338 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McKee v. Peoria Unified School District 338 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
v. Rogers, –39, –08 (1991)).
CONGRESS ELEMENTARY SCH. DIST. v. Warren 251 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
CONGRESS ELEMENTARY SCH. DIST. v. Warren 251 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Young 224 P.3d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Young 224 P.3d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
v. Rogers, -39 , -08 (1991)).
Schoeneweis v. Hamner 221 P.3d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Schoeneweis v. Hamner 221 P.3d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Lake v. City of Phoenix 218 P.3d 1004 Ariz. 2009
Lake v. City of Phoenix 218 P.3d 1004 Ariz. 2009
v. Rogers, (noting that the public does not have the right to access private records that are unrelated to the government agency’s activities).
Arpaio v. Davis 210 P.3d 1287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Arpaio v. Davis 210 P.3d 1287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Lake v. City of Phoenix 207 P.3d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Lake v. City of Phoenix 207 P.3d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
v. Rogers, -39 , -08 (1991) (quoting Mathews, 75 Ariz. at 78 , 251 P.2d at 895 ).
Phoenix New Times, L.L.C. v. Arpaio 177 P.3d 275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Phoenix New Times, L.L.C. v. Arpaio 177 P.3d 275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
v. Rogers, -41 , -10 (1991) (citing Church of Scientology v. City of Phoenix Police Dep’t, , ); Scottsdale Unified Sch.
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Ellis 159 P.3d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Ellis 159 P.3d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
2 ¶ 16 , , the supreme court in Griffis discussed three alternative definitions of public records.
Griffis v. Pinal County 156 P.3d 418 Ariz. 2007
Griffis v. Pinal County 156 P.3d 418 Ariz. 2007
¶5 The court of appeals, P.2d 900 (1991), reversed the superior court’s judgment, holding that personal e-mails are not “public records or other matters” under Arizona’s public records law and, therefore, need not be disclosed.
Griffis v. Pinal County 141 P.3d 780 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Griffis v. Pinal County 141 P.3d 780 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
London v. Broderick 80 P.3d 769 Ariz. 2003
London v. Broderick 80 P.3d 769 Ariz. 2003
v. Rogers, -41, -10 (1991) (stating Arizona courts will look to FOIA for guidance in interpreting Arizona’s public records act).
State v. Wilson 26 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Wilson 26 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
See also Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian *399 , (“[T]he mere fact that a writing is in the possession of a public officer or public agency does not make it a public record.”); Kirkpatrick v. Industrial Comm’n, 10 Ariz.App.
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 955 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1998
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 955 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1998
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 of Maricopa County v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 937 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 of Maricopa County v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 937 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See, e.g., Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Rogers, Inc., -41 , -10 (1991) (citing Church of Scientology v. Phoenix Police Dep’t., , ).
Star Publishing Co. v. Pima County Attorney's Office 891 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Star Publishing Co. v. Pima County Attorney's Office 891 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994