Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co., 832 P.2d 203.

77 citing documents.

Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
Co., Inc., -57, -10 (1992) (demanding clear and convincing evidence); -63 , -79 (1986) (requiring, as a predicate, an “evil hand” being guided by an “evil mind” which “either consciously sought to damage the [victim] or acted intentionally, knowing that
Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army 24 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army 24 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co., -57 , -10 (1992), , and Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Ins.
Murcott v. Best Western International, Inc. 9 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Murcott v. Best Western International, Inc. 9 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Co., , (quoting Rawlings, 151 Ariz. at 162 , 726 P.2d at 578 ).
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Aranki v. RKP Investments, Inc. 979 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Aranki v. RKP Investments, Inc. 979 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co., Inc.
O'DAY v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co. 959 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1998
O'DAY v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co. 959 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1998
(holding that a tortious wrongful discharge plaintiff is entitled “to ordinary tort damages — all damages legally caused by the tort.”).
Doe v. Roe 955 P.2d 951 Ariz. 1998
Doe v. Roe 955 P.2d 951 Ariz. 1998
Napier v. Bertram 954 P.2d 1389 Ariz. 1998
Napier v. Bertram 954 P.2d 1389 Ariz. 1998
Nolde v. Frankie 949 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co., , aff'd on other grounds
Florez v. Sargeant 917 P.2d 250 Ariz. 1996
Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co. 927 P.2d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co. 927 P.2d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Gau v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 901 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Gau v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 901 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co., , (discussing whether employer owes duty not only to employee but also to employee’s spouse to notify employee of impending cancellation of family health insurance): To the contrary, the extension is narrowly circumscribed, and the merchant, by satisfying its duty to the suspect, will gen
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co., -57 , , 209-10 (1992); , Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Ins.
Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc. 883 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc. 883 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Prod *180 ucts Co.