Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Turner v. Devlin, 848 P.2d 286.
- Hoenack v. Gannett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Hoenack v. Gannett
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
A “statement on matters of public concern must be provable as false before there can be liability.” (quoting Milkovich v. Lorain J. Co., 497 U.S. 1, 19 (1990)).
- harris/iheartmedia v. Hon. Randall warner/mccarthy Ariz. 2023
-
harris/iheartmedia v. Hon. Randall warner/mccarthy
Ariz. 2023
“To be defamatory, a publication must be false and must bring the defamed person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or must impeach plaintiff’s honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.” –04 (1993) (quoting Godbehere v. Phx.
- Blk III, LLC v. Skelton 506 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Blk III, LLC v. Skelton
506 P.3d 812
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Put simply, the plaintiff must show that the statement is “provable as false before a defamation action can lie.”
- Wendy Rogers v. Hon. mroz/pamela Young 502 P.3d 986 Ariz. 2022
- Wendy Rogers v. Hon. mroz/pamela Young 502 P.3d 986 Ariz. 2022
- Takieh M.D. v. O'Meara M.D. 497 P.3d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Takieh M.D. v. O'Meara M.D.
497 P.3d 1000
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶14 To support a claim for defamation, a statement about a private figure on a matter of private concern “must be false” and must bring the subject of the statement “into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule” or impeach the subject’s “honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.” –04 (1993) (quoting Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., ).
- Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Tarter v. Bendt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(citing Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 16, 19- 20 & n.6 (1990)).
- Danam v. Az Board of Education Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Danam v. Az Board of Education
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In any event, to be defamatory, a publication must be false, and we already have determined that substantial evidence supported the Board's factual findings.
- True North v. Lai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- True North v. Lai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Riordan-Karlsson v. Az Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Riordan-Karlsson v. Az Bank
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Restatement (Second) of Torts (“Restatement”) § 558 (1977).
- John Doe v. Mahoney 418 P.3d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
John Doe v. Mahoney
418 P.3d 1013
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
" Sign Here , 243 Ariz. at 104, ¶ 15 , 402 P.3d at 462 (quoting *1018 Turner v. Devlin , , 203-04, , 288-89 (1993) ).
- Sign Here v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Sign Here v. Chavez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶11 Because this case raises issues concerning the right to free speech, we conduct an “enhanced appellate review” to assure “the foregoing determinations will be made in a manner so as not to constitute a forbidden intrusion of the field of free expression.” 204 (1993) (internal quotation omitted) (–76 (1991)).
- Phonejockey v. Rinella Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Phonejockey v. Rinella
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-04 (1993); Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 340 (1989).
- Pinal County v. Cooper 360 P.3d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Pinal County v. Cooper
360 P.3d 142
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“To be defamatory, a publication must be false and must bring the defamed person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or must impeach plaintiffs honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.” -04 , (citation omitted).
- Reynolds v. Reynolds 294 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
Reynolds v. Reynolds
294 P.3d 151
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
“To be defamatory, a publication must be false and must bring the defamed person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or must impeach plaintiffs honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.” -04 , -89 (1993) (quoting Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., , ).
- Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
¶43 “‘To be defamatory, a publication must be false and must bring the defamed person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or must impeach plaintiff’s honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation.’” -04, -89 (1993), quoting Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
- Lewis v. Oliver 873 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Lewis v. Oliver
873 P.2d 668
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
See, , Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., , , cf. Angel v. Ward, 258 S.E.2d at 791 (IRS agent was a public official).
- Sanchez v. Coxon 854 P.2d 126 Ariz. 1993
-
Sanchez v. Coxon
854 P.2d 126
Ariz. 1993
See, , , 77-78 n. 3, 81 n. 7, , 329-30 n. 3, 333 n. 7 (1991); Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.