Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Findlay v. Lewis, 837 P.2d 145.

58 citing documents.

Strategic Development & Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC 226 P.3d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Strategic Development & Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC 226 P.3d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
P. 6(b) (after specified period to act expires, court may extend time upon showing of excusable neglect); -47 , -49 (1992) (appellate court will not substitute its judgment for the superior court’s management of its docket in determining whether to grant motion for extension of time).
In Re Estate of Newman 196 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Estate of Newman 196 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Marvin Johnson, 184 Ariz. at 102 , 907 P.2d at 71 (“[U]nder Rule 42(b), Ariz.R.Civ.P., a court may order separate trials for claims within a case in order to further the convenience of the parties or to avoid prejudice.”); , (“A trial court has broad discretion over the management of its docket.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
(citing Bounds); , (“[W]hen an inmate is denied access to a law library for security or other reasons, and when alternative means are satisfied by his having the assistance of persons trained in the law, the cour
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993