Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc., 841 P.2d 198.

63 citing documents.

Denton v. Superior Court 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
See Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc., , (factor in court’s decision to accept special action jurisdiction was that issue was question of law).
Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 957 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 957 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Kizzar v. Superior Court 953 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Kizzar v. Superior Court 953 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.
Pompa v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR MARICOPA 931 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Pompa v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR MARICOPA 931 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Car don v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.
Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY. 925 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY. 925 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc., , 210
HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc., , (special action jurisdiction appropriate when there is a pure issue of law); Orme Sch.
Sanchez v. Coxon 854 P.2d 126 Ariz. 1993
Sanchez v. Coxon 854 P.2d 126 Ariz. 1993
Our decision on the merits terminates the litigation, Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc., , and declining jurisdiction would require Petitioners to stand trial — thereby losing much of the benefit of their claimed immunity, -100 , , *95 1163-64 (Ct.App.1989).