Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of Regents, 866 P.2d 1330.
-
Martin v. Schroeder
105 P.3d 577
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
of Regents, , (“The existence of a statute criminalizing conduct is one aspect of Arizona law supporting the recognition of duty in this cause of action.”).
- Pleak v. Entrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-
Pleak v. Entrada
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
of Regents, P.2d 1330 (1994); Ruth Fisher Elementary Sch.
- Steiger v. Woods 32 P.3d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Steiger v. Woods
32 P.3d 19
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
of Regents, , *101 1335 (1994).
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. Craig 26 P.3d 510 Ariz. 2001
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. Craig 26 P.3d 510 Ariz. 2001
- True v. Stewart 18 P.3d 707 Ariz. 2001
- Walters v. Maricopa County 990 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Walters v. Maricopa County 990 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Samaritan Health System v. Superior Court 981 P.2d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Samaritan Health System v. Superior Court
981 P.2d 584
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
of Regents, -254 , -40 (1994) (“[U]nder [the anti-abrogation clause], Arizona’s judiciary shares responsibility for the evolution of the law of torts.”)(emphasis added); , (Grant, J., concurring) ([the anti-abrogation clause] prohibits abrogation
- Ramirez v. Health Partners 972 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
-
Ramirez v. Health Partners
972 P.2d 658
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
of Regents, , (recognizing public policy, societal and technological changes as factors in evolution of tort law)
- State v. Superior Court of State 945 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
State v. Superior Court of State
945 P.2d 1334
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
of Regents, 251 , , *207 1335, 1337 (1994).
- Estate of Hernandez v. Flavio 930 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1997
- Estate of Hernandez v. Flavio 930 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1997
- Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 917 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1996
-
Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc.
917 P.2d 689
Ariz. 1996
of Regents, (Arizona courts will entertain an action for damages against a non-licensee who negligently furnishes alcohol to those under the legal drinking age.).
- State v. Tarango 914 P.2d 1300 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Tarango
914 P.2d 1300
Ariz. 1996
of Regents, , (citations omitted); , (“Courts construe seemingly conflicting statutes in harmony when possible.”); Pima County v. Maya Constr.
- Adams v. State 916 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
-
Adams v. State
916 P.2d 1156
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
of Regents, -54 , -41 (1994)
- Estate of Hernandez v. Flavio 924 P.2d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
-
Estate of Hernandez v. Flavio
924 P.2d 1036
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
As our supreme court said in an earlier appeal in this case: “We are hard pressed to find a setting where the risk of an alcohol-related injury is more likely than from underaged drinking at a university fraternity party the first week of the new college year.”
- Cox v. May Department Store Co. 903 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Cox v. May Department Store Co. 903 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- A. UBERTI & C. v. Leonardo in & for PIMA 892 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1995
-
A. UBERTI & C. v. Leonardo in & for PIMA
892 P.2d 1354
Ariz. 1995
of Regents, , , 1333 *567 (1994).
- Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 891 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 891 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Callender v. MCO PROPERTIES 885 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Callender v. MCO PROPERTIES
885 P.2d 123
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
we agree with Callender that section 4-301 simply does not apply to MCO and does not grant it immunity.
- Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
-
Hayes v. Continental Insurance
872 P.2d 668
Ariz. 1994
(examining statute’s history, effects, wording, and the *269 context of the overall legislative scheme).
- Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n 866 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1994
-
Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n
866 P.2d 1342
Ariz. 1994
and Si-mental v. Magma Copper Co., No. CV-92-0036PR, which present related issues.