Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sanchez v. Coxon, 854 P.2d 126.

36 citing documents.

Arojojoye v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Arojojoye v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 1 (App. 2012); -95 (1993) (accepting special action from denial of motion to dismiss based on claim of immunity, in part because “declining jurisdiction would require Petitioners to stand trial – thereby losing much of the benefit 1 The Arizona Supreme Court revised the Arizona Rules of Procedure for Special Actions effectiv
Karen Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Oversight 515 P.3d 1275 Ariz. 2022
Karen Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Oversight 515 P.3d 1275 Ariz. 2022
at 137 ¶ 16; (recognizing the Arizona Constitution as a source of immunity for state legislators).
Javan Mesnard Et Ux v. Hon. campagnolo/shooter Ariz. 2021
Javan Mesnard Et Ux v. Hon. campagnolo/shooter Ariz. 2021
Sutto, Jr. v. Bonham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sutto, Jr. v. Bonham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Although we may review the denial of a motion to dismiss as part of an appeal from a final judgment, Bonham challenged only the superior court’s jurisdiction in his motion to dismiss, not the validity of the trustee’s sale.
In Re PIMA COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH20130801 347 P.3d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
In Re PIMA COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH20130801 347 P.3d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Accordingly, “[a]ppeal after entry of judgment typically is the proper method to challenge the denial of a motion to dismiss.” see Pima Cnty.
Zutz v. Nelson 788 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2010
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. Fields 75 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. Fields 75 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
1019 (1951) (listing states with constitutional provisions embodying legislative immunity); , (recognizing Arizona Constitution as source of immunity for state legislators).
Feld v. Gerst 66 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Feld v. Gerst 66 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Montano v. Browning 48 P.3d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Montano v. Browning 48 P.3d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(stating that in determining whether a privilege exists, Arizona courts first look to case law; however, when none exists, we look to the Restatement)
Burns v. Davis 993 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Burns v. Davis 993 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Matter of Guardianship/Conservatorship of Denton 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
Denton v. Superior Court 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
Matter of Guardianship/Conservatorship of Denton 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
(holding that special action jurisdiction is appropriate for issues of first impression before this court).
Denton v. Superior Court 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
(holding that special action jurisdiction is appropriate for issues of first impression before this court).
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Strohson 945 P.2d 1251 Ariz. 1997
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Strohson 945 P.2d 1251 Ariz. 1997
Kizzar v. Superior Court 953 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Kizzar v. Superior Court 953 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.
Florez v. Sargeant 917 P.2d 250 Ariz. 1996
Galati v. Lake Havasu City 920 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Galati v. Lake Havasu City 920 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(absolute legislative immunity for allegedly libelous statement council member made during town council meeting).
State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Powers 908 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Powers 908 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995