Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. Miller, 859 P.2d 1323.

88 citing documents.

Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. Fields 75 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. Fields 75 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Hanley v. Pearson 61 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Hanley v. Pearson 61 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Thues 54 P.3d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Thues 54 P.3d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Miller, , and will ascribe plain meaning to its terms unless they are ambiguous.
Long v. Napolitano 53 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Long v. Napolitano 53 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Romley v. Arpaio 40 P.3d 831 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Romley v. Arpaio 40 P.3d 831 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Miller, , and we will ascribe plain meaning to its terms unless they are ambiguous.
In Re John M. 36 P.3d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In Re John M. 36 P.3d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Miller, , and will ascribe plain meaning to its terms unless they are ambiguous.
In Re Kyle M. 27 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In Re Kyle M. 27 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Citadel Care Center v. Arizona Department of Revenue 25 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Citadel Care Center v. Arizona Department of Revenue 25 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Camelback Plaza Development, L.C. v. Hard Rock Café International (Phoenix), Inc. 25 P.3d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Camelback Plaza Development, L.C. v. Hard Rock Café International (Phoenix), Inc. 25 P.3d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Byers-Watts v. Parker 18 P.3d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Byers-Watts v. Parker 18 P.3d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Miller, , and will ascribe plain meaning to its terms unless they are ambiguous.
Tripati v. State 16 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Tripati v. State 16 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Johnson v. Davis 12 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Johnson v. Davis 12 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Mead v. Holzmann 8 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Mead v. Holzmann 8 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Affordable Bail Bonds 6 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Affordable Bail Bonds 6 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Lucille v. Dodge 5 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Lucille v. Dodge 5 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Estancia Development Associates, L.L.C. v. City of Scottsdale 993 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Estancia Development Associates, L.L.C. v. City of Scottsdale 993 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Miller, , , uncertainty about the meaning or interpretation of the statute’s terms requires the appellate court to apply methods of statutory interpretation that go beyond the statute’s literal language.
Hansson v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 985 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hansson v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 985 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Miller, , (citation omitted), vacated in part on other grounds, , see also Freightways, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, -48 , -44 (1981).
Pima County v. Gonzalez 969 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Pima County v. Gonzalez 969 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Miller, , vacated in part on other grounds
Rondberg v. Arizona Board of Chiropractic Examiners 897 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Rondberg v. Arizona Board of Chiropractic Examiners 897 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Miller, , vacated in part on other grounds