Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n, 866 P.2d 1342.

72 citing documents.

Ball v. Ball 478 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ball v. Ball 478 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
7 BALL v. BALL Opinion of the Court of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, –70, ¶ 13, n.6 (App. 2011) (declining to address “larger constitutional question” of whether Arizona Constitution provides a right to abortion); Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass’n, Inc., (finding correct construction of relevant statutes negated need to address the constitutional issue).
Arizonans for Second Chances v. Hobbs Ariz. 2020
Arizonans for Second Chances v. Hobbs Ariz. 2020
Fair & Rodeo Ass’n, Inc., (explaining that we do not reach constitutionality of a statute if “unnecessary in determining the merits of the action”).
Muscat v. creative/akande Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Muscat v. creative/akande Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
Fair & Rodeo Ass’n, (“The question is whether the relationship of the parties was such that the defendant was under an obligation to use some care to avoid or prevent injury to the plaintiff.” (quoting Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 356)).
Paul E. v. Courtney F. 418 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Paul E. v. Courtney F. 418 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Fair & Rodeo Ass'n , , 259, , 1345 (1994) ("Arizona's courts do not reach constitutional issues if proper construction of a statute makes it unnecessary in determining the merits of the action.").
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Fair & Rodeo Ass’n, Inc., ).
Jackie Abbott v. Banner Health Network 372 P.3d 933 Ariz. 2016
Jackie Abbott v. Banner Health Network 372 P.3d 933 Ariz. 2016
Fair and Rodeo Ass’n, Inc.
Denmon v. Safarian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Denmon v. Safarian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Manuel Jesus Pesqueira 333 P.3d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Manuel Jesus Pesqueira 333 P.3d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Fair and Rodeo Ass’n, Inc.
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Fair & Rodeo Ass’n, P.2d 1342 (1994).
Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLC 294 P.3d 135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLC 294 P.3d 135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
2462 , 125 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993); Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass’n
Saldate v. Montgomery 268 P.3d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Saldate v. Montgomery 268 P.3d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Fair & Rodeo Ass'n, Inc., , ("Arizona's courts do not reach constitutional issues if proper construction of a statute makes it unnecessary____”).
In Re Nickolas S. 245 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2011
Gelb v. Department of Fire, Building & Life Safety 241 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Gelb v. Department of Fire, Building & Life Safety 241 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Fair & Rodeo Ass'n, , )).
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. 166 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. 166 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
See Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair and Rodeo Ass’n Inc., , (holding that “Arizona’s courts do not reach constitutional issues if proper construction of a statute makes it unnecessary in determining the merits of the action.”).
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Background ¶2 When reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim, “‘we must take the alleged facts as true.’” Riddle v. Ariz. Oncology Servs., Inc., quoting Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass’n
Barrett v. Harris 86 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Barrett v. Harris 86 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass’n, Inc.
Moulton v. Napolitano 73 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Moulton v. Napolitano 73 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Bloxham v. Glock Inc. 53 P.3d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Bloxham v. Glock Inc. 53 P.3d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
¶ 17 The Bloxhams also argue that Petolic-chio v. Santa Cruz County Fair and Rodeo Ass’n, Inc., , establishes that Arizona courts look “beyond artificial categories to find a duty where the defendant has the ability to take reasonable steps to prevent the foreseeable harm.” In Petolicchio, an employee of the defendant stole liquor from the defendant and furnished the alcohol to a minor, who
State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
See Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair and Rodeo Ass’n, Inc., , (an event is superseding only if unforeseeable and, with benefit of hindsight, abnormal or extraordinary).
Goodman v. Samaritan Health System 990 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Goodman v. Samaritan Health System 990 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Association
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
See, , Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass’n, , Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 357 , 706 P.2d at 369 (“The test for whether conduct is negligent is whether there is a foreseeable risk of injury from the conduct.”); , , 172 n. 5, , 1240 n. 5 (A
Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n 941 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1997
Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n 941 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1997
R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11 936 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1997
R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11 936 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1997
see Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc., , see also Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona,-U.S.-, -, 117 S.Ct.
Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc. 955 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc. 955 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
See, e.g., Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass’n
Tellez v. Saban 933 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996