Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State Compensation Fund v. Symington, 848 P.2d 273.
- State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court 948 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court
948 P.2d 499
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-92 , -77 (1993), for example, the Arizona Supreme Court accepted special action jurisdiction to determine whether the State workers’ compensation system is subject to federal taxation.
- City of Tucson v. Woods 959 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
City of Tucson v. Woods
959 P.2d 394
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
our supreme court expanded on the reasons as follows: 1.
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Hull 945 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1997
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Hull 945 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1997
- McComb v. Superior Court 943 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- McComb v. Superior Court 943 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Florez v. Sargeant 917 P.2d 250 Ariz. 1996
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Sanchez v. Coxon 854 P.2d 126 Ariz. 1993
- Sanchez v. Coxon 854 P.2d 126 Ariz. 1993