Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mail Boxes v. Industrial Commission, 888 P.2d 777.

187 citing documents.

VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Premiere RV & Mini Storage LLC v. Maricopa County 215 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Premiere RV & Mini Storage LLC v. Maricopa County 215 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
v. Industrial Comm’n of Ariz., , ).
Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp. 197 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp. 197 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Watson v. Apache County 189 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Watson v. Apache County 189 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Dowling v. Stapley 179 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Dowling v. Stapley 179 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Waldren 171 P.3d 1214 Ariz. 2007
State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Waldren 171 P.3d 1214 Ariz. 2007
Sheehan v. Flower 170 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sheehan v. Flower 170 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Estate of Rodriguez 160 P.3d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Estate of Rodriguez 160 P.3d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Slayton 154 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Slayton 154 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucson 153 P.3d 1045 Ariz. 2007
William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucson 153 P.3d 1045 Ariz. 2007
State v. Ross 151 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Ross 151 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc. 150 P.3d 236 Ariz. 2007
Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc. 150 P.3d 236 Ariz. 2007
Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Comm’n, (“The primary rule of statutory construction is to find and give effect to legislative intent.”).
Gamez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 141 P.3d 794 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 10 The ALJ, quoting Mail Boxes, , stated the rule that a sole proprietor’s average monthly wage is “measured by the market value of services rendered.” The ALJ then reasoned that because “both labor market consultants agreed that applicant’s position at D & D Builders [was] not available in the open and competitive
Roubos v. City of Tucson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Roubos v. City of Tucson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Martinez v. Green 131 P.3d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Martinez v. Green 131 P.3d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMON 134 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMON 134 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Comm’n, see also Holland v. Williams Mountain Coal Co., 256 F.3d 819, 823 (D.C.
Pamela Manic v. Tucson City Attorney's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Pamela Manic v. Tucson City Attorney's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Estate of Jung 109 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Estate of Jung 109 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. 108 P.3d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. 108 P.3d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Mail Boxes, etc. U.S.A., v. Industrial Comm’n of Ariz., , , 334 ¶ 5, see Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co., 292 F.3d 1139, 1147 (9th Cir.2002).
Orfaly, George, Albrecht, Reid v. Tucson Symphony Society... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Orfaly, George, Albrecht, Reid v. Tucson Symphony Society... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc. 88 P.3d 565 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004