Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Goulder v. Arizona Department of Transportation, 877 P.2d 280.

35 citing documents.

Albert L. v. Dcs, B.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Albert L. v. Dcs, B.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Reyes 360 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Reyes 360 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The goal is to achieve consistency among the related statutes.” Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., , ajfd
In re MH2013-001564 322 P.3d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In re MH2013-001564 322 P.3d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., , 416, , 999 (App.1993) (“Statutory provisions are to be read in the context of related provisions and of the overall statutory scheme.”), affd
DIANA H. v. Rubin 171 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Robson Ranch Quail Creek, LLC v. Pima County 161 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Robson Ranch Quail Creek, LLC v. Pima County 161 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
¶18 Furthermore, we must read § 11-821 together with other statutes on the same subject matter “to determine legislative intent and to maintain harmony.” Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., aff’d, P.2d 280 (1994).
Williams v. Baugh 154 P.3d 373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Williams v. Baugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Williams v. Baugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
o person in this state shall be subject to civil liability for engaging in conduct otherwise justified pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.” “Statutes relating to the same subject matter should be read in pari materia to determine legislative intent and to maintain harmony.” Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., aff’d, P.2d 280 (1994).
Williams v. Baugh 154 P.3d 373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
“[n]o person in this state shall be subject to civil liability for engaging in conduct otherwise justified pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.” “Statutes relating to the same subject matter should be read in pari materia to determine legislative intent and to maintain harmony.” Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., , affd
Yarbrough v. Montoya-Paez 147 P.3d 755 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Yarbrough v. Montoya-Paez 147 P.3d 755 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
The goal is to achieve consistency among the related statutes.” Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., , 416, , 999 (App.1993), aff 'd, , (citation omitted).
Mago v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc. 142 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Mago v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc. 142 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., , 416, , 999 (App.1993) (“Statutes relating to the same subject matter should be read in pari materia to determine legislative intent and to maintain harmony.”), aff'd
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Motor Vehicle Div., aff’d, P.2d 280 (1994).
Commitment of Olin Gene Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
In Re the Commitment of Taylor 78 P.3d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
In Re the Commitment of Taylor 78 P.3d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-49 , -23 (App. 1997) (citations omitted), quoting Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., , 416, , 999 (App.1993), aff'd
Commitment of Olin Gene Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-49, -23 (App. 1997) (citations omitted), quoting Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., aff’d P.2d 280 (1994).
People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of Tucson 20 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of Tucson 20 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Goulder v. Arizona Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., affd
Milner v. Colonial Trust Co. 6 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Milner v. Colonial Trust Co. 6 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See Goulder v. Arizona Dep’t of Transp., , , aff'd
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
The goal is to achieve consistency among the related statutes.” Goulder v. Arizona Dep’t of Transp., , 416, , 999 (App.1993), aff'd
Forino v. Arizona Department of Transportation 952 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Forino v. Arizona Department of Transportation 952 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
wherein the court notes that the language in A.R.S.
Bill Alexander Ford, Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Casa Ford, Inc. 931 P.2d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Bill Alexander Ford, Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Casa Ford, Inc. 931 P.2d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See Goulder v. Arizona Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., , 868 * aff'd
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Goulder v. Arizona Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., , 416, , 999 (App. 1993), aff'd