Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Juvenile Action No. JS-8490, 876 P.2d 1137.

86 citing documents.

Jaclyn R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jaclyn R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Alicia M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Alicia M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Action No. JS-8490, ), and the adoptability of the child.
William W. v. Brooke S., P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
William W. v. Brooke S., P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8490
Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 312 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 312 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Action No. JS-8490, and may take into account that “[i]n most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the children,” In re Maricopa Cnty.
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Xavier R. and Athena R. v. Ades and Joseph R. 280 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Xavier R. and Athena R. v. Ades and Joseph R. 280 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Action No. JS-8490, the evidence establishes the following.
Vanessa H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 159 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Vanessa H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 159 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Action No. JS-8490, , (“We view the facts in a light most favorable to affirming the trial court’s findings.”).
In Re Jeremiah T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
In Re Jeremiah T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Although there were a number of conflicts and inconsistencies in the five witnesses’ testimony for the trial court to resolve, see In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8490, (fact-finder assesses credibility and resolves evidentiary conflicts), their existence and resolution are irrelevant to the purely legal issue presented on appeal.
In re Daniel A. 108 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In re Daniel A. 108 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Andrew A. 58 P.3d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
In Re Andrew A. 58 P.3d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Sec., , In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8490
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 995 P.2d 682 Ariz. 2000
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 995 P.2d 682 Ariz. 2000
Moreover, “[w]e view the facts in a light most favorable to affirming the trial court’s findings.” In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8490
Audra v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 982 P.2d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Audra v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 982 P.2d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8490
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-132905 925 P.2d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-132905 925 P.2d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Juvenile Action No. JS-8490
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
E.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8k90