Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Waddell v. Arizona State Land Department, 887 P.2d 985.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Damrrion Jacquis Matthews Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
    And even assuming the factual basis to which Matthews agreed in pleading guilty was defective—a question that is not before us and that we do not decide—“[i]t is well established in this state that a judge is not limited to a defendant’s statement at the plea hearing in ascertaining a factual basis for a guilty plea.” ().
  • State v. Simental 563 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    See Johnson, 181 Ariz. at 349 (“[C]ourts reviewing the factual basis of a guilty plea should be allowed to examine numerous sources in order to promote substantial justice.”); (explaining that the evidence to support a guilty plea “may be derived from any part of the record including presentence reports, preliminary hearing transcripts, or admissions of the defendant”).
  • State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    See, (colorable claim of ineffective assistance requires more than vague speculation and conclusory allegations); (factual basis to support each element of the crime may be established by the defendant’s admissions); ¶ 12 (App. 2013) (guilty plea waives claims “except those that relate to the validity of a plea”).
  • State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    (stating the factual basis need not show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; only strong evidence of guilt need be established); (stating the factual basis to support a plea may be ascertained from the extended record).
  • State v. Estling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1504(A)(1); (“A factual basis can be established by ‘strong evidence’ of guilt and does not require a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”).
  • State v. Irvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    (strong evidence of guilt required); (factual basis may be established by the extended record).
  • State v. Kim Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Offutt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶13 “A factual basis can be established by ‘strong evidence’ of guilt and does not require a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Lechuga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Ware Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Andrada-Pastrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    The factual basis may “be established by ‘strong evidence’ of guilt and does not require a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • State v. Cecena-Cota Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Clayton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Tina T. v. Department of Child Safety 339 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State of Arizona v. Kevin Ottar and Ruan Junior Hamilton 302 P.3d 622 Ariz. 2013
    §§ 13- 105(34), -3405(A)(2); (recognizing the elements of possession of narcotics for sale).
  • State v. Chairez 327 P.3d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
    When the trial court asked Chairez at the change-of-plea hearing whether he agreed with the facts as the prosecutor had represented them to be, Chairez responded, “Yes, I do.” ¶ 10 These statements and the extended record provided a sufficient factual basis for the pleas, , demonstrating Chairez had directed another person to perform acts that were designed to help finance the Arizona Mexican Mafia.
  • State of Arizona v. Edward James Rose 297 P.3d 906 Ariz. 2013
    Cortez, Jr. ¶21 Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 17.3 requires the court to “determine that there is a factual basis for the plea.” “A factual basis can be established by ‘strong evidence’ of guilt and does not require a finding of guilt beyond a 9 reasonable doubt.” ( ).
  • State v. Rainwater 931 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996