Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 898 P.2d 964.
- Nationstar v. Magnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Nationstar v. Magnum
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of America, (applying the discovery rule to the accrual of a claim for breach of contract).
- Isgro v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Isgro v. Wells Fargo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Am., (The discovery rule generally applies only where “[t]he injury or the act causing the injury, or both, have been difficult for the plaintiff to detect.”) (internal quotation omitted).
- Gallardo v. West Sand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Gallardo v. West Sand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Fisher v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 427 P.3d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Fisher v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.
427 P.3d 791
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
588-89, , 966-97 (1995) (noting that a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff "knew or reasonably should have known" of the events giving rise to the claim).
- Mertola LLC v. Alberto santos/arlene Santos 422 P.3d 1028 Ariz. 2018
- Mertola LLC v. Alberto santos/arlene Santos 422 P.3d 1028 Ariz. 2018
- Bellamy v. Rollins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Bellamy v. Rollins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Shafer v. McCombs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Shafer v. McCombs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Am., (citation omitted)).
- Sonoran v. Bank of the West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Sonoran v. Bank of the West
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Am., (cause of action accrues when the plaintiff knows, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should know, the facts underlying the claim).
- Wilson v. Drake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Wilson v. Drake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Kresock v. Depaoli
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
of Am., ( and Brooks v. S. Pac.
- Mertola, LLC v. Santos 390 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Mertola, LLC v. Santos
390 P.3d 812
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co. of Am., (citations omitted).
- Rainer v. Swift Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Rainer v. Swift Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- National v. Gallagher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- National v. Gallagher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Ader v. Estate of Felger 375 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
-
Ader v. Estate of Felger
375 P.3d 97
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Co. of Am., (statute of limitations does not run from moment of defendant’s injurious conduct but from when claimant knows or should know of injury and facts underlying cause).
- Stebbins v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Stebbins v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Nelson v. Sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Nelson v. Sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Northstar v. Collingwood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Northstar v. Collingwood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Merrick v. D. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Merrick v. D. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- Atreus Communities Group v. Stardust Development, Inc. 277 P.3d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Atreus Communities Group v. Stardust Development, Inc.
277 P.3d 208
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co. of Amer., , Allied Mut.
- Thompson v. Pima County 243 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
- Thompson v. Pima County 243 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
- Lee v. State 242 P.3d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Lee v. State
242 P.3d 175
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co. of Am., , (holding that the trial court correctly *179 let the jury decide when discovery of a contract injury occurred).
- ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP v. Callaway 246 P.3d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP v. Callaway 246 P.3d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Porter v. Spader 239 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Porter v. Spader
239 P.3d 743
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co. of Am., , we further recognize that, generally, “claims that are clearly brought outside the relevant limitations period are conclusively barred.” ¶ 4 , ( , Gre
- Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc. 211 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc. 211 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009