Sohl v. Winkler
Cited by
- Jones v. Hon Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Anthony v. Hon. wilkins/anthony Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Stanford 323 P.3d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Jacob T. Osterkamp v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
- Grace Howard Allen v. Ades and T.S.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Robinson v. Hotham 118 P.3d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- In re Approximately $50,000.00 in United States Currency 2 P.3d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 923 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- J.D.S. v. Franks 893 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1995
Opinion text
ORDER This is the time set for oral argument on petitioner’s application for a stay. Telephonic oral argument is had with Kevin E. Kane participating for petitioner, and Vincent J. Festa participating for the state before the duty justice. Following oral argument, the duty justice took the matter under advisement. LATER: IT IS ORDERED denying petitioner’s application for a stay. It appearing to the Court that the denial of the application for a stay moots the petition for review, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing the petition for review. Of course, any order herein is without prejudice to any rights the petitioner may have hereafter either in the trial court or on appeal following trial court proceedings. /s/ James Moeller JAMES MOELLER Vice Chief Justice