Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marvin Johnson, PC v. Myers, 907 P.2d 67.

87 citing documents.

Dyrek v. Dyrek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Dyrek v. Dyrek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Knight v. Fontes Ariz. 2025
Knight v. Fontes Ariz. 2025
v. Myers, just as the court of appeals “constitutes a single court,” A.R.S.
Dyrek v. Dyrek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Dyrek v. Dyrek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
v. Myers, (acknowledging “imprecise use of the word ‘jurisdiction’” in cases involving non-jurisdictional errors).
Cota v. Keene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cota v. Keene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Myers, ¶ 9 n.2 (App. 2003).
Olesen v. daniel/burge 484 P.3d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Olesen v. daniel/burge 484 P.3d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Gregan v. East Valley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gregan v. East Valley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Myers, ("The single trial court of general jurisdiction is the superior court.").
Rohan Mgmt., Inc. v. Jantzen 436 P.3d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rohan Mgmt., Inc. v. Jantzen 436 P.3d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Myers , , 102, , 71 (1995), with jurisdiction conferred by the state constitution and statutes, Schoenberger v. Bd.
Botto v. Botto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Botto v. Botto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dipasquale v. Dipasquale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Dipasquale v. Dipasquale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Myers, and the separation of the superior court into divisions is “purely imaginary and for convenience only,”
Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Quam v. Grove Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Quam v. Grove Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Calcagno v. Ainbinder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Calcagno v. Ainbinder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sierra Tucson, Inc. v. Bergin Ex Rel. County of Pima 372 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Sierra Tucson, Inc. v. Bergin Ex Rel. County of Pima 372 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Johnson v. Walton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Johnson v. Walton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Myers, P.2d 67 (1995).
In Re Marriage of Dougall 316 P.3d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
In Re Marriage of Dougall 316 P.3d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Rinegar v. Rinegar 290 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Rinegar v. Rinegar 290 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State of Arizona v. Jaime Rene Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Jaime Rene Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
v. Myers, -02, -71 (1995) (noting “imprecise use” of jurisdictional language in cases involving non-jurisdictional error).
State v. Maldonado 223 P.3d 653 Ariz. 2010
State v. Maldonado 223 P.3d 653 Ariz. 2010
Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
v. Myers, 12 (App. 1996).
State v. Patterson 218 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Patterson 218 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
v. Myers, , ); , ("Its separation into divisions is purely imaginary and for convenience only.
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State v. Payne 225 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009