Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State ex rel. McDougall v. Howe, 893 P.2d 732.

19 citing documents.

Jurnee H. v. Dcs, N.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Franks, and generally includes the right to have counsel participate and cross-examine adverse witnesses, see Ariz. State Dep’t of Pub.
Ramirez v. Barnet 384 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Franks, (whether court has jurisdiction under the UCCJEA is question of law reviewed de novo) (citation omitted).
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Franks, 94, 745 (1995) (approving exercise of foreign court’s emergency jurisdiction where court “could have found that there was an emergency because of the poor condition of the baby’s health” even where an Arizona court also had jurisdiction).
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety 332 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Joshua J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 286 P.3d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
v. Franks, , (agreeing that “a parent’s right to control and custody of his children is a fundamental right, and the state cannot deprive a parent of this relationship without due process”).
Jared P. v. Glade T. 209 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
v. Franks, , 84 n. 1, , 735 n. 1 (1995).
Melgar v. Campo 161 P.3d 1269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Willie G. & Bonnie H. v. Ades, Nycole G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
v. Franks, In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-949
Willie G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 119 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
v. Franks, , In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-949
Welch-Doden v. Roberts 42 P.3d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
David S. v. Audilio S. 32 P.3d 417 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Leonardo 22 P.3d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
In re Johnny S., 40 Cal.App.4th 969 , 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 94 (App.1995); see also In re Adoption of A.M.
Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State 16 P.3d 757 Ariz. 2001
v. Franks, , (“[W]e need not decide this issue to resolve this case, we will leave it to another day.”).
Clouse v. State 11 P.3d 1012 Ariz. 2000
v. Franks, , (“[W]e need not decide this issue to resolve this case, we will leave it to another day.”).
LUIS A. v. Bayham-Lesselyong 4 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
v. Franks, , (accepting special action jurisdiction in cases involving juveniles when appeal may involve unconscionable delay); , (accepting jurisdiction in a case of first impression presenting purely legal issues likely to recur and to affect man
Taylor v. Jarrett 959 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
v. Franks, , (citations omitted).
In Re the Marriage of Tonnessen 941 P.2d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 923 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6982 922 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
v. Franks, , 84 n. 1, , 735 n. 1 (1995).