Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court, 972 P.2d 179.
- West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 26 P.3d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 26 P.3d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- Defenders of Wildlife v. Hull 18 P.3d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- Defenders of Wildlife v. Hull 18 P.3d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State 16 P.3d 757 Ariz. 2001
- Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State 16 P.3d 757 Ariz. 2001
- Zuther v. State 14 P.3d 295 Ariz. 2000
-
Zuther v. State
14 P.3d 295
Ariz. 2000
1483 (1994); , , 189 ¶ 15 (1999).
- Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 11 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2000
-
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
11 P.3d 1006
Ariz. 2000
§ 1-244; , Bush v. Industrial Comm’n, , Gallo v. Industrial Comm’n
- Clouse v. State 11 P.3d 1012 Ariz. 2000
- Clouse v. State 11 P.3d 1012 Ariz. 2000
- State v. Donald 10 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-
State v. Donald
10 P.3d 1193
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
These factors, our supreme court has commented, “provide[] the necessary flexibility yet still maintain[ ] the goal of the separation of powers doctrine.” ¶ 37
- Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. Myers 1 P.3d 706 Ariz. 2000
- Calik v. Kongable 990 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1999
- Calik v. Kongable 990 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1999
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source 989 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1999
-
In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source
989 P.2d 739
Ariz. 1999
Ct., , (holding retroactive changes unconstitutional in substantial part).
- Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 989 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
989 P.2d 157
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Arizona Dep’t of Public Safety v. Superior Court (Falcone)
- State v. Murray 982 P.2d 1287 Ariz. 1999
-
State v. Murray
982 P.2d 1287
Ariz. 1999
-05 , -89 (1999) (substantive legislation may not retroactively alter vested rights).
- Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-
Martin v. Reinstein
987 P.2d 779
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
2636 , 65 L.Ed.2d 742 (1980)); , (although declaration of intent may be helpful in interpretation, text of measure is most reliable guide).
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Bolton 977 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1999
-
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Bolton
977 P.2d 790
Ariz. 1999
More recently, , we resolved numerous constitutional challenges to the 1995 legislative revisions of the general adjudication process and surface water rights.