Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Vega v. Morris, 910 P.2d 6.

28 citing documents.

SPQR Venture, Inc. v. Robertson 349 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
SPQR Venture, Inc. v. Robertson 349 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Further, we construe statutes so as to give effect to the whole and presume that “‘the legislature does not include in statutes provisions which are redundant, void, inert, trivial, superfluous or contradictory.’ ” ( ).
Hon. Fields v. Elected Officials Retirement Ariz. 2014
Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 320 P.3d 1160 Ariz. 2014
Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 320 P.3d 1160 Ariz. 2014
(noting court construes statutes to avoid rendering portions superfluous); (rejecting an interpretation that would render the statute in question “essentially meaningless”).
Hon. Fields v. Elected Officials Retirement Ariz. 2014
(noting court construes statutes to avoid rendering portions superfluous); (rejecting an interpretation that would render the statute in question “essentially meaningless”).
Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSB 253 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSB 253 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Further, we construe statutes so as to give effect to the whole and presume that “‘the legislature does not include in statutes provisions which are redundant, void, inert, trivial, superfluous or contradictory.’ ”
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Under the discovery rule, accrual of a cause of action occurs when the “plaintiff knows or, in the *179 exercise of reasonable diligence, should know the facts underlying the cause.” Gust, Rosenfeld, 182 Ariz. at 588 , 898 P.2d at 966 ; , (cause of action accrues when “plaintiff knows or reasonably should have known” of defendant’s negligent conduct).
Marriage of Donlann v. MacGurn 55 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Marriage of Donlann v. MacGurn 55 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
v. Maricopa County, ¶ 23 , (presumption that “the legislature does not intend to draft statutory provisions that are redundant, void, inert, trivial, superfluous or contradictory”) ( , ).
Airport Properties v. Maricopa County 985 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Airport Properties v. Maricopa County 985 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
City of Tucson v. Rineer 971 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
City of Tucson v. Rineer 971 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
(the legislature generally does not include statutory provisions that are redundant, inert, superfluous or contradictory).
Merrick v. Lewis 964 P.2d 473 Ariz. 1998
Followed Merrick v. Lewis 964 P.2d 473 Ariz. 1998
(general rule of interpretation is that legislature does not include redundant, superfluous, or contradictory provisions in statutes).
Doe v. Roe 955 P.2d 951 Ariz. 1998
Doe v. Roe 955 P.2d 951 Ariz. 1998
See, e.g., *326 -64 , -9 (1996); 13 O’ (“Tolling statutes based on mental ineompetency are enacted to relieve from the strict time restrictions people ‘who are unable to protect their legal rights because of an overall inability to function in societ
State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court 948 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court 948 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(holding the legislature does not include statutory provisions that are redundant, void, inert, trivial, superfluous or contradictory); , (“The creation of the compensation law and the compensation fund therein was legislativ
Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Logerquist v. Danforth 932 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Logerquist v. Danforth 932 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Florez v. Sargeant 917 P.2d 250 Ariz. 1996
Florez v. Sargeant 917 P.2d 250 Ariz. 1996
Indeed, this very term, we described the disability for “unsound mind” under § 12-502(A) as one for “incompetents” and “persons who are insane.” -64 , -9 (1996).