Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ruiz v. Hull, 957 P.2d 984.

111 citing documents.

Qwest Corp. v. City of Chandler 217 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Yollin v. City of Glendale 191 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Yollin v. City of Glendale 191 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Stonecreek Bldg. Co., Inc. v. Shure 162 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Stonecreek Bldg. Co., Inc. v. Shure 162 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
¶ 13 , ( ¶ 35 , (stating that when construing a statute, “we must read the statute as a whole and give meaningful operation to each of its provisions”)).
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
¶ 69 , (rejecting the interpretation of a constitutional amendment in an Attorney General’s opinion but not requiring its withdrawal).
Twin Peaks Construction, Inc. v. Weatherguard Metal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Twin Peaks Construction, Inc. v. Weatherguard Metal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Kromko v. Arizona Board of Regents 146 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Kromko v. Arizona Board of Regents 146 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of Phoenix 142 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of Phoenix 142 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Int’l, Inc., , 194 n. 4, ¶ 10, , 763 n. 4 (2002) ( , ).
Mejak v. Granville 136 P.3d 874 Ariz. 2006
Mejak v. Granville 136 P.3d 874 Ariz. 2006
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 126 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 126 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 15 Further, “we must read the statute as a whole and give meaningful operation to each of its provisions.” ¶ 13 , ( ¶35 , ).
Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 121 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 121 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
¶ 25 , (“[W]here the regulation in question impinges on core constitutional rights, the standards of strict scrutiny apply and the burden of showing constitutionality is shifted to the proponent of the regulation.”).
Ziemak v. Schnakenberg 111 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Ziemak v. Schnakenberg 111 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
And, when interpreting a statute, “‘we must read the statute as a whole and give meaningful operation to each of its provisions.’ ”
State v. Hazlett 73 P.3d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Hazlett 73 P.3d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 25 , United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., 529 U.S. 803, 816 , 120 S.Ct.
Higginbottom v. State 51 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Matt W Russ v. Jim irvin/betsey Bayless Ariz. 2002
Matt W Russ v. Jim irvin/betsey Bayless Ariz. 2002
Ruiz v. Hull, 191 Ariz. 441, 449, ¶ 28
Higginbottom v. State 51 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
When interpreting a statute, “we must read the statute as a whole and give meaningful operation to each of its provisions.” ¶ 35
Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. 52 P.3d 760 Ariz. 2002
Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. 52 P.3d 760 Ariz. 2002
Sherman v. City of Tempe 45 P.3d 336 Ariz. 2002
Sherman v. City of Tempe 45 P.3d 336 Ariz. 2002
See Ruiz v. Hull, 191 Ariz. 441, 450 ¶ 35, ¶ 35 (1998) (“When construing statutes, we must .
McDonald v. Thomas 40 P.3d 819 Ariz. 2002
McDonald v. Thomas 40 P.3d 819 Ariz. 2002
In a different context, we have held that an official act is “any act done by [an] officer in his official capacity, under color and by virtue of his office.” ¶ 31, ¶ 31 (1998) (quoting Kerby v. State ex rel.
Hurley Trucking Co. v. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation 39 P.3d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Hurley Trucking Co. v. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation 39 P.3d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Hurley’s reading of the 1988 amendments accordingly runs afoul of a basic principle of statutory interpretation: words, phrases, clauses, and sentences in statutes are presumed to perform a function and not to be merely “void, inert, redundant or trivial.” , ¶ 35 , (stating that in construing statutes, an appellate court must read the language as a whole and give meaningful operation to each provision).
Arpaio v. Steinle 35 P.3d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Arpaio v. Steinle 35 P.3d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co., ¶ 10 , ( ¶ 33 , ); see also A.R.S.
US West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 34 P.3d 351 Ariz. 2001
US West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 34 P.3d 351 Ariz. 2001
State v. Carrasco 33 P.3d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Carrasco 33 P.3d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
In re 1996 Nissan Sentra 32 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
In re 1996 Nissan Sentra 32 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Kurti v. Maricopa County 33 P.3d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Kurti v. Maricopa County 33 P.3d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
But, “where the regulation in question impinges on core constitutional rights, the standards of strict scrutiny apply and the burden of showing constitutionality is shifted to the proponent of the regulation.” ¶ 25 , (citations omitted).
Samsel v. Allstate Insurance 19 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Samsel v. Allstate Insurance 19 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
We read the statute as a whole, giving “meaningful operation to each of its provisions.”
City of Tucson v. Pima County 19 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
City of Tucson v. Pima County 19 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
¶ 33 “The right to petition bars state action interfering with access to the legislature, the executive branch and its various agencies, and the judicial branch,” , 457 ¶ 61, (citations omitted), cert.
McDonald v. Thomas 12 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by