Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Fidelity Security Life Insurance v. State, 954 P.2d 580.

290 citing documents.

Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co. v. State, Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 4, the successor trustee, MTC Financial, Inc. DBA Trustee Corps (“MTC”), did not become an Arizona-licensed insurer until February 5, 2010 and was not, therefore, qualified to act as trustee when it recorded the notice of trustee’s sale on April 30, 2009.1 See Ariz. Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S
Medrano v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Medrano v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Schugg v. Az Brd of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Schugg v. Az Brd of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co. v. State, Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 4, ).
Beres v. Beres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beres v. Beres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 4
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co v. State, Dep’t of Ins., ).
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mirchandani v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A. 326 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mirchandani v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A. 326 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Terterova v. byous/nestor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Terterova v. byous/nestor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
U-Haul v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
U-Haul v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Wolfson v. B of a Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Wolfson v. B of a Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Koss Corp. v. American Express Co. 309 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Koss Corp. v. American Express Co. 309 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 4
State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase 304 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase 304 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Ins., (defendant has burden to show existence of immunity agreement by preponderance of evidence).
Blankenbaker v. Marks 299 P.3d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Blankenbaker v. Marks 299 P.3d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna Highlands 296 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna Highlands 296 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins.
Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLC 294 P.3d 135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLC 294 P.3d 135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 4 , ).
Coleman v. City of Mesa 284 P.3d 863 Ariz. 2012
Coleman v. City of Mesa 284 P.3d 863 Ariz. 2012
Coleman v. City of Mesa 265 P.3d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Coleman v. City of Mesa 265 P.3d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Co. v. State, Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 4 , (stating that dismissal for failure to state a claim is appropriate only if “as a matter of law ...
Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A. 261 P.3d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A. 261 P.3d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
YUMA VALLEY LAND CO., LLC v. City of Yuma 256 P.3d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
YUMA VALLEY LAND CO., LLC v. City of Yuma 256 P.3d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Estate of Braden Ex Rel. Gabaldon v. State 238 P.3d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Estate of Braden Ex Rel. Gabaldon v. State 238 P.3d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 7 , (stating that “liability of public servants is the rule in Arizona and immunity is the exception”).
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., -26, ¶¶ 10-12 , -84 (1998) (concluding that insurance department’s decision to grant company’s application for transfer of domicile not entitled to absolute immunity, even though it involved some discretion, because decision only implemented policy).
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 217 P.3d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 217 P.3d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 7
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 4
Tostado v. City of Lake Havasu 204 P.3d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Tostado v. City of Lake Havasu 204 P.3d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
v. Dep’t of Ins., ¶ 10 , (“To be absolutely immune ...