Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix, 961 P.2d 449.

166 citing documents.

Fehribach v. Smith 22 P.3d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
¶¶ 15-16 , (our comparative fault and contribution statutes undertake to increase the fairness of our tort system by making all contributing tortfeasors bear responsibility for accidental injuries in proportion to their relative degrees of fault); Dietz v. General Elec.
Gunnell v. Arizona Public Service Co. 18 P.3d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
¶ 16 Unlike the dissent’s approach, we do not “comb[ ] the record for evidence supporting a conclusion or inference different from that reached [by the trial court].”
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 4 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 4 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
As our supreme court has said, “[w]e have no doubt that jurors are capable of evaluating degrees of fault, and the statute *365 reflects our legislature’s agreement.” ¶ 21
Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd. 3 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd. 3 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
We will not, nor may a trial judge, “reweigh the evidence and set aside the jury verdict merely because the jury could have drawn different inferences or conclusions or because [the judge felt] that other results [were] more reasonable.” , (citing Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Ry.
Clouse v. STATE, DPS 984 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Clouse v. STATE, DPS 984 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
They cite Ryan , where the State negligently allowed an inmate to escape; , where a dispatcher negligently processed a phone call; , vacated on other grounds, , where a 911 operator negligently processed a phone call.
Warrington v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 3 P.3d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Warrington v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 3 P.3d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See McFarlin, 127 Ariz. at 224 , 619 P.2d at 733 ; Styles v. Ceranski
In Re Estate of Pouser 975 P.2d 704 Ariz. 1999
In Re Estate of Pouser 975 P.2d 704 Ariz. 1999
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998