Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Legislative Council v. Howe, 965 P.2d 770.

26 citing documents.

Arizona for Abortion Access v. Montenegro Ariz. 2025
Arizona for Abortion Access v. Montenegro Ariz. 2025
Lane v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Lane v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 22 (1998)) (establishing the standards for ballot language referred to voters by legislative body).
Quality Education & Jobs Supporting I-16-2012 v. Bennett 292 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2013
Rep Andrew Tobin v. Hon Rea 291 P.3d 983 Ariz. 2013
Rep Andrew Tobin v. Hon Rea 291 P.3d 983 Ariz. 2013
See Ariz. Legislative Council v. Howe, 192 Ariz. 378, 382-83 ¶¶ 11-14, -75 (1998); Fairness & Accountability in Ins.
Quality Education & Jobs Supporting I-16-2012 v. Bennett 292 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2013
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Grant 217 P.3d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Grant 217 P.3d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Cicoria v. Cole 215 P.3d 402 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Cicoria v. Cole 215 P.3d 402 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Campbell v. Barton 215 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Campbell v. Barton 215 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Hardesty 204 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Hardesty 204 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Yes for Az!/col River Indian v. Rep Jim Wiers Ariz. 2002
Yes for Az!/col River Indian v. Rep Jim Wiers Ariz. 2002
Kromko v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 1137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Kromko v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 1137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
As support for his contention, he relied at oral argument on cases cited by the amicus curiae in its brief
Sotomayor v. Burns 13 P.3d 1198 Ariz. 2000
Citizens for Growth Management v. Groscost 13 P.3d 1188 Ariz. 2000
Healthy Arizona Initiative PAC v. Groscost 13 P.3d 1192 Ariz. 2000
Healthy Arizona Initiative PAC v. Groscost 13 P.3d 1192 Ariz. 2000
Citizens for Growth Management, 199 Ariz. at 74 , 13 P.3d at 1191
Citizens for Growth Management v. Groscost 13 P.3d 1188 Ariz. 2000
Fairness & Accountability in Ins.
Sotomayor v. Burns 13 P.3d 1198 Ariz. 2000
§ 19-124(B), the Council’s analysis must be impartial; this means that the “language ‘must not mislead.’” Citizens for Growth Management, 199 Ariz. at 73 , 13 P.3d at 1190 ( , ).