Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State, 16 P.3d 757.
- Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of Flagstaff 66 P.3d 44 Ariz. 2003
-
Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of Flagstaff
66 P.3d 44
Ariz. 2003
-15 ¶¶ 30-79, - 76 ¶¶ 30-79 (2001) (Feldman, J., dissenting).
- State v. Morrison 56 P.3d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
State v. Morrison
56 P.3d 63
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
203 n. 14, ("court[s] traditionally do[ ] not address issues not presented by the parties").
- State v. Meza 50 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Flood Control Dist. v. Gaines 43 P.3d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
Flood Control Dist. v. Gaines
43 P.3d 196
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
¶ 12 More recently, ¶ 24 , the Arizona Supreme Court held that the legislature acted within the power granted to it by the Arizona Constitution Article 4, Part 2, Section 18 (the immunity clause) when it enacted a statute defining instances in which public entities and employees are entitled to immunity, [1
- Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Department 30 P.3d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Department 30 P.3d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache County 18 P.3d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache County
18 P.3d 713
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Safety, , (quoting de’Sha v. Reed, 194 Colo.