Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Panzino v. City of Phoenix, 999 P.2d 198.

66 citing documents.

Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(quoting Rodgers v. Watt, 722 F.2d 456, 459 (9th Cir.1983); , ); ¶ 19 , (recognizing the strong public policy favoring the finality of judgments); , (noting that the six-month limit of Rule 60(c)(i)-(3) "was designed to ensure the finality of judgments”).
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
However, “[ujnder general rules of agency, which apply to the attorney-client relationship, ‘[t]he neglect of the attorney is equivalent to the neglect of the client himself when the attorney is acting within the scope of his authority.’ ” , (quoting Balmer v. Gagnon, 19 Ariz.App.
Haroutunian v. Valueoptions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Haroutunian v. Valueoptions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
P., describing the duties of counsel, requires attorneys to “keep[] advised of the status of cases in which [they have] appeared.” (“‘[T]he client is charged with the actions and omissions of its attorney.’”), quoting Mission Ins.
Marriage of Birt v. Birt 96 P.3d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Marriage of Birt v. Birt 96 P.3d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
rt to vacate a judgment for “any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” It may be applied when relief is not available under any of the other subsections to the rule, Edsall, 143 Ariz. at 243 , 693 P.2d at 898 , and “when our systemic commitment to finality of judgments is outweighed by extraordinary circumstances of hardship or injustice.” ¶ 6 , (citations and internal quotations omitted).
Glaze v. Larsen 83 P.3d 26 Ariz. 2004
Glaze v. Larsen 83 P.3d 26 Ariz. 2004
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 69 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 69 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley 45 P.3d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley 45 P.3d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Co. v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross, -11 , -7 (App.1991), disapproved on other grounds