Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Steinfeld v. Nielsen, 139 P. 879.

74 citing documents.

State v. ESTES CORPORATION 558 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. ESTES CORPORATION 558 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Atkinson v. Marquart 541 P.2d 556 Ariz. 1975
Atkinson v. Marquart 541 P.2d 556 Ariz. 1975
142 , , 139 P. 879 (1913).
Moore v. Industrial Commission 538 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Moore v. Industrial Commission 538 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
414, 418 , , 139 P. 879, 896 (1913), wherein the following definition was adopted regarding “vested rights.” “ ‘Rights are vested, in contradistinction to being expectant or contingent.
American Savings Life Insurance v. Financial Affairs Management Co. 513 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
American Savings Life Insurance v. Financial Affairs Management Co. 513 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
139 P. 879 (1914): “ ‘If a statute providing a remedy is repealed while proceedings are pending, such proceedings will be thereby determined, unless the legislature shall otherwise provide, and, if it be amended instead of repealed, the judgment pronounced in such proceedings must be according to the law as it then
Johnson v. Arizona Public Service Co. 498 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
In Re Dos Cabezas Power District 498 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
In Re Dos Cabezas Power District 498 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
139 P. 879, 896 (1913), adopted the following rule: "`Rights are vested, in contradistinction of being expectant or contingent.
Johnson v. Arizona Public Service Co. 498 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
139 P. 879, 896 (1913), adopted the following rule: “ ‘Rights are vested, in contradistinction of being expectant or contingent.
Mims v. Valley National Bank 481 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Mims v. Valley National Bank 481 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
139 P. 879 (1914), satisfied the procedural requirements.
Nordin v. Kaldenbaugh 435 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Nordin v. Kaldenbaugh 435 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
139 P. 879 (1914); Hatch v. Emery, 1 Ariz.App.
Alger v. Brighter Days Mining Corp. 160 P.2d 346 Ariz. 1945
Alger v. Brighter Days Mining Corp. 160 P.2d 346 Ariz. 1945
Miami Copper Co. v. State 149 P. 758 Ariz. 1915
Miami Copper Co. v. State 149 P. 758 Ariz. 1915
Schwertner v. Provident Mutual Building-Loan Ass'n 148 P. 910 Ariz. 1915
Schwertner v. Provident Mutual Building-Loan Ass'n 148 P. 910 Ariz. 1915
De Mund v. Olcester 141 P. 573 Ariz. 1914
Landers v. Joerger 140 P. 209 Ariz. 1914