Civil No. 1139
Precedential
Dismissed
Processed
Demund v. Meade
Cited by
- Sanders v. Folsom 451 P.2d 612 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Airesearch Mfg. Co. 206 P.2d 562 Ariz. 1949
- Olney v. Bishop 114 P. 559 Ariz. 1911
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. In this cause the appellant has failed to file the printed abstract required by rule 1 of this court ( 8 Ariz. iv , 71 Pac. vi ). The transcript of the reporter’s notes does not serve the purpose of the abstract required by the rule. The purpose of the abstract is to enable each of the justices sitting to have a copy of the record before him, and the requirement of the rule must be complied with. Furthermore, none of the assignments of error is sufficiently alleged. The appeal is dismissed. CAMPBELL, J., not sitting.