Hagenauer v. Detroit Copper Mining Co.
Cited by
- Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company … Ariz. Ct. App. 2012
- Montano v. Scottsdale Baptist Hospital, Inc. 581 P.2d 682 Ariz. 1978
- Marsh v. Hawkins 437 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. 1968
- Daniel v. City of Tucson 79 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1938
- Mitchell v. Vulture Mining & Milling Co. 55 P.2d 636 Ariz. 1936
- Kunselman v. Southern Pacific Railroad 263 P. 939 Ariz. 1928
- Gambrell v. McKean 237 P. 196 Ariz. 1925
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. 127 P. 713 Ariz. 1912
- Dunagan v. Detroit Copper Mining Co. 124 P. 812 Ariz. 1912
- Pitt v. Detroit Copper Mining Co. 124 P. 813 Ariz. 1912
- Balin v. Detroit Copper Mining Co. 124 P. 811 Ariz. 1912
- Backstein & Naubauer v. Detroit Copper Mining Co. 124 P. 811 Ariz. 1912
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Motes v. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. 68 P. 532
- Keppler v. Becker 80 P. 334
- Boudreaux v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. 114 P. 547
Opinion text
FRANKLIN, C. J., Concurring.—I concur in the judgment, on the ground that the amended complaint was but an amplification, or elaboration, of the cause of action imperfectly stated in the original complaint. The amended complaint did not state a new or different cause of action, and was not a departure from law to law, or from fact to fact, such as would prevent it from relating back to the time of filing the original complaint. By relating back it tolled the statute of limitations. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Wyler, 158 U. S. 285 , 39 L. Ed. 983 , 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 877; Motes v. Gila Valley etc. Ry. Co., 8 Ariz. 50 , 68 Pac. 532 ; Boudreaux v. Tucson etc. Co., 13 Ariz. 361 , 33 L. R. A., N. S., 196, 114 Pac. 547 . The judgment of the lower court, sustaining the demurrer setting up the statute of limitations to the amended complaint, and dismissing the action, is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to' overrule the special demurrer. ROSS, J., concurs. NOTE.-—As to when an action is said to be pending, see note in Ann. Cas. 1912A, 843.