Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dowdy v. Calvi, 125 P. 873.

38 citing documents.

Tonnemacher v. Touche Ross & Co. 920 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Tonnemacher v. Touche Ross & Co. 920 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
at 81-82 ; Mach-Tronics, Inc. v. Zirpoli, 316 F.2d 820, 833 (9th Cir. 1963); , 125 P. 873 (1912).
McKinley v. Town of Fredonia 680 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
McKinley v. Town of Fredonia 680 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
The exercise of the discretion ought to tend, in a reasonable degree at least, to bring about a judgment on the very merits of the case; and when the circumstances are such as to lead the court to hesitate upon the motion to open the default, it is better as a general rule that the doubt should be resolved in favor of the application.’ ” 107 Ariz. at 513 , 489 P.2d at 852 ( , 125 P. 873, 878 (1912)).
Hennesy Equipment Sales Co. v. Valley National Bank 543 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Phillips v. Findlay 507 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Phillips v. Findlay 507 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
125 P. 873 (1912): “The court in opening the default acted clearly within its discretion.
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
17 A.L.R.3d 617 ] ; , ; , ; , ; Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc., , ; , ; Lynch *560 v. Arizona Enterprise Mining Co., , 179 P. 956 ; , 125 P. 873 .
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc. 426 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1967
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc. 426 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1967
Gray v. Dillon 396 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1964
Gray v. Dillon 396 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1964
604 ; , ; Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc., , ; , ; , 179 P. 956 ; , 125 P. 873 .
Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc. 258 P.2d 816 Ariz. 1953
Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc. 258 P.2d 816 Ariz. 1953
125 P. 873, 878 , we quoted with approval from Watson v. San Francisco & H. B. R. R. Co., 41 Cal.
Marsh v. Riskas 236 P.2d 746 Ariz. 1951
Marsh v. Riskas 236 P.2d 746 Ariz. 1951
Appellee cites numerous Arizona cases, , ; , ; , ; , 125 P. 873 , among others, to the general effect that default judgments are not favored, since it does not result in a determination of the merits of a claim; that an appellate court should be more loathe to reverse an order vacating a default judgment than an order denying a motion; and their main contention, which
Rawlins v. Wilson 187 P.2d 322 Ariz. 1947
Rawlins v. Wilson 187 P.2d 322 Ariz. 1947
Painter v. Freije 176 P.2d 690 Ariz. 1947
Painter v. Freije 176 P.2d 690 Ariz. 1947
— For good causé shown the court may set aside an entry of default and, if a judgment by default has been entered, may likewise set it aside in accordance with Rule 60(b).” , , a case having reference to a default judgment, , 125 P. 873 , as follows: “The exercise of the discretion ought to tend, in a reasonable degree at least, to bring about a judgment on the very merits of.
Brown v. Beck 169 P.2d 855 Ariz. 1946
Brown v. Beck 169 P.2d 855 Ariz. 1946
127 P. 715 ; , 125 P. 873 .
White v. Davidson 46 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1935
White v. Davidson 46 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1935
Miller v. Arizona Bank 43 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1935
Miller v. Arizona Bank 43 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1935
Buerger Brothers Supply Co. v. El Rey Furniture Co. 40 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1935
Mosher v. Lount 264 P. 98 Ariz. 1928
Mosher v. Lount 264 P. 98 Ariz. 1928
Tucson National Bank v. Gomez 234 P. 560 Ariz. 1925
Tucson National Bank v. Gomez 234 P. 560 Ariz. 1925
Daly v. Okamura 213 P. 389 Ariz. 1923
Daly v. Okamura 213 P. 389 Ariz. 1923
Navajo-Apache Bank & Trust Co. v. Desmont 170 P. 798 Ariz. 1918
Navajo-Apache Bank & Trust Co. v. Desmont 170 P. 798 Ariz. 1918