Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Faulkner v. Board of Supervisors, 149 P. 382.
- Crouch v. City of Tucson 699 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
Crouch v. City of Tucson
699 P.2d 1296
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
149 P. 382 (1915); , 292 P. 603 (1930).
- Rural/Metro Fire Dept., Inc. v. Pima County 596 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- Rural/Metro Fire Dept., Inc. v. Pima County 596 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- Donaghey v. Attorney General 584 P.2d 557 Ariz. 1978
- Donaghey v. Attorney General 584 P.2d 557 Ariz. 1978
- Gieszl v. Town of Gilbert 529 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Gieszl v. Town of Gilbert 529 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- City of Scottsdale v. McDowell Mountain Irrigation & Drainage District 483 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1971
- City of Scottsdale v. McDowell Mountain Irrigation & Drainage District 483 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1971
- Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court 480 P.2d 988 Ariz. 1971
-
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court
480 P.2d 988
Ariz. 1971
149 P. 382 (1915) this court recognized that a writ of certiorari “cannot be used to review the actions of inferior tribunals, boards or officers, in the exercise of legislative, executive or ministerial functions.
- Ricca v. Bojorquez 473 P.2d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
-
Ricca v. Bojorquez
473 P.2d 812
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
64 P. 417 (1901); , 149 P. 382 (1915)
- State Ex Rel. Pickrell v. Downey 430 P.2d 122 Ariz. 1967
-
State Ex Rel. Pickrell v. Downey
430 P.2d 122
Ariz. 1967
Appellees rely upon earlier Arizona cases, , 149 P. 382 (1915) ; Kenney v. Bank of Miami, 19 * P. 866 (1918)
- BOARD OF EDUC., TUCSON HS DIST. NO. 1 v. Williams 403 P.2d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
-
BOARD OF EDUC., TUCSON HS DIST. NO. 1 v. Williams
403 P.2d 324
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Certiorari § 17, p. 142; , 149 P. 382 [1915].
- Uhlmann v. Wren 401 P.2d 113 Ariz. 1965
- Burton v. City of Tucson 356 P.2d 413 Ariz. 1960
-
Burton v. City of Tucson
356 P.2d 413
Ariz. 1960
64 P. 417 ; , 149 P. 382 ; Skinner v. City of Phoenix, supra.
- Reid v. Ford 239 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1952
-
Reid v. Ford
239 P.2d 1079
Ariz. 1952
149 P. 382, 383 , where it was said: “ * * * This writ cannot be used to review the actions of inferior tribunals, boards, or officers, in the exercise of legislative, executive, or ministerial functions.
- Findlay v. Board of Sup'rs of County of Mohave 230 P.2d 526 Ariz. 1951
- Findlay v. Board of Sup'rs of County of Mohave 230 P.2d 526 Ariz. 1951
- Parnell v. State Ex Rel. Wilson 206 P.2d 1047 Ariz. 1949
-
Parnell v. State Ex Rel. Wilson
206 P.2d 1047
Ariz. 1949
292 P. 603 ; Faulkner v. Board of Sup’rs, , 149 P. 382 ; , 235 P. 150 ; 51 C.J. 311, section 6; Daniels v. Newbold, 125 Iowa 193, 196 , 100 N.W.
- Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. Wright 166 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1946
-
Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. Wright
166 P.2d 943
Ariz. 1946
Section 28-101, A.C.A.1939; , 158 P. 845 ; , 149 P. 382 .
- Skinner v. City of Phoenix 95 P.2d 424 Ariz. 1939
- Skinner v. City of Phoenix 95 P.2d 424 Ariz. 1939
- McDonald v. Cochise County 292 P. 603 Ariz. 1930
- McDonald v. Cochise County 292 P. 603 Ariz. 1930
- Kenney v. Bank of Miami 170 P. 866 Ariz. 1918
-
Kenney v. Bank of Miami
170 P. 866
Ariz. 1918
reading at page 142, 149 Pac.