Civil No. 1468
Precedential
Processed
Llanos de Oro Mining & Milling Co. v. McComas
Cited by
- State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Lake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider 311 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State v. MENDOZA-TAPIA 273 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
- Lake Havasu Irrigation & Drainage District v. Dubois 573 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Prell 517 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Parra 459 P.2d 344 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- State v. Essman 403 P.2d 540 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Carter 399 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
- State v. Little 350 P.2d 756 Ariz. 1960
- Burgunder v. State of Arizona 103 P.2d 256 Ariz. 1940
Opinion text
PEE CTJEIAM. This cause having been upon the calendar for a considerable time, and no action being taken by either of the parties, it was by the court of its own motion ordered submitted for decision. Upon an examination of the record it appears that no appearance has been made in this court by either of the parties. No error has been assigned, no brief filed, and nothing done to indicate in any way why the judgment of the trial court should be disturbed. Because there has been an utter lack of effort to prosecute the appeal, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby,dismissed.