Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Valentine v. Shepherd, 168 P. 643.
- Coombs v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company 531 P.2d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
-
Coombs v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company
531 P.2d 1145
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
361 , , , 168 P. 643 (1917); University Realty & Development Co. v. Omid-Gaf, Inc., 19 Ariz.App.
- Duhame v. Navopache Electric Cooperative, Inc. 488 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Duhame v. Navopache Electric Cooperative, Inc. 488 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Lyon v. Big Bend Development Co. 435 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Lyon v. Big Bend Development Co. 435 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Fovargue v. Singer 270 P.2d 1090 Ariz. 1954
-
Fovargue v. Singer
270 P.2d 1090
Ariz. 1954
168 P. 643 , 644: “ * * * Where the language used by the parties to express the terms and conditions of their contract is plain and unambiguous, their intention or understanding is to be found in their contract, and not from the ex parte assertions of either party.
- Crone v. Amado 214 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1950
-
Crone v. Amado
214 P.2d 518
Ariz. 1950
If we assume that the written memorandum constitutes the entire agreement between the parties it is so pregnant with patent and latent ambiguities that it became the duty of the trial court to construe it, and “where a contract is ambiguous or equivocal * * * extrinsic evidence may be resorted to for the purpose of determining the real meaning of the contract.” , 168 P. 643, 644 , , 281 P. 211 .
- Kirkpatrick v. Christensen 206 P.2d 577 Ariz. 1949
- Kirkpatrick v. Christensen 206 P.2d 577 Ariz. 1949
- The O.S. Stapley Co. v. F.O. Newby 110 P.2d 547 Ariz. 1941
- The O.S. Stapley Co. v. F.O. Newby 110 P.2d 547 Ariz. 1941
- Lee v. Standard Cement Pipe Company 103 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1940
- Lee v. Standard Cement Pipe Company 103 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1940
- Dover Copper Mining Co. v. Doenges 12 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1932
- Dover Copper Mining Co. v. Doenges 12 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1932
- Wallace v. First National Bank 7 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1932
- Wallace v. First National Bank 7 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1932
- Chandler Improvement Co. v. Andersen 7 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1932
- Chandler Improvement Co. v. Andersen 7 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1932
- Miller Cattle Co. v. Mattice 298 P. 640 Ariz. 1931
- Miller Cattle Co. v. Mattice 298 P. 640 Ariz. 1931
- Miller Cattle Co. v. Francis 281 P. 211 Ariz. 1929
- Miller Cattle Co. v. Francis 281 P. 211 Ariz. 1929
- Pleasant v. Arizona Storage & Distributing Co. 267 P. 794 Ariz. 1928
- Pleasant v. Arizona Storage & Distributing Co. 267 P. 794 Ariz. 1928
- Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Upton Oil Co. 266 P. 3 Ariz. 1928
- Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Upton Oil Co. 266 P. 3 Ariz. 1928
- Merchants & Stock Growers Bank v. Marley 264 P. 471 Ariz. 1928
- Merchants & Stock Growers Bank v. Marley 264 P. 471 Ariz. 1928