Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Maseeh, 179 P. 53.

40 citing documents.

Wallace Imports, Inc. v. Howe 673 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Wallace Imports, Inc. v. Howe 673 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Hille v. Safeco Insurance Company of America 543 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hille v. Safeco Insurance Company of America 543 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
This is the holding of the Arizona Supreme Court in Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Automobile and Casualty Underwriters, supra, , 179 P. 53 (1919), and *355
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters 493 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1972
Universal Under. Ins. Co. v. State Auto. & Cas. Under. 493 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1972
Universal Under. Ins. Co. v. State Auto. & Cas. Under. 493 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1972
In 1919, , 179 P. 53 (1919), this Court held that proof of ownership of a motor vehicle is prima facie evidence that the driver of the vehicle causing damage by its negligent operation is the servant or agent of the owner and using the vehicle in the business of the owner.
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters 493 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1972
In 1919, , 179 P. 53 (1919), this Court held that proof of ownership of a motor vehicle is prima facie evidence that the driver of the vehicle causing damage by its negligent operation is the servant or agent of the owner and using the vehicle in the business of the owner.
Davis v. VUMORE CABLE COMPANY 484 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Davis v. VUMORE CABLE COMPANY 484 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
In support of their position, they cite the cases of Flores v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , , 267 P. 947 (1928); , 179 P. 53 (1919).
Marks v. Goodding 394 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1964
Marks v. Goodding 394 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1964
In Baker v. Maseeh (1919), , 179 P. S3, this court held that proof of ownership is prima facie evidence that the driver of an automobile is the servant or agent of the owner, and using the vehicle in the owner’s business, and that the burden is on the owner to show that such relationship and use did not exist.
Dungan v. Brandenberg 230 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1951
Dungan v. Brandenberg 230 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1951
179 P. 53, 55 , and Consolidated Motors, Inc., v. Ketcham, , , which he asserts raise the presumption that the driver was the company’s servant.
Silva v. Traver 162 P.2d 615 Ariz. 1945
Silva v. Traver 162 P.2d 615 Ariz. 1945
Collins v. Riverside Amusement Park Co. 145 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1944
Collins v. Riverside Amusement Park Co. 145 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1944
It is the duty of the court in a suit for damages, based upon negligence, to direct a verdict for the defendant upon the conclusion of all the testimony if the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict for the plaintiff.” Aside from the foregoing cases cited, the appellee herein has cited a great many cases, among them being many Arizona cases: , 179 Pac.
Flores v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. 97 P.2d 206 Ariz. 1939
Flores v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. 97 P.2d 206 Ariz. 1939
Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. Ketcham 66 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1937
Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. Ketcham 66 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1937
Brooks v. Neer 47 P.2d 452 Ariz. 1935
Brooks v. Neer 47 P.2d 452 Ariz. 1935
Dover Copper Mining Co. v. Doenges 12 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1932
Dover Copper Mining Co. v. Doenges 12 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1932
Hatchimonji v. Homes 3 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1931
Hatchimonji v. Homes 3 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1931
Lutfy v. Lockhart 295 P. 975 Ariz. 1931
Lutfy v. Lockhart 295 P. 975 Ariz. 1931
Otero v. Soto Ex Rel. Gonzales 267 P. 947 Ariz. 1928
Otero v. Soto Ex Rel. Gonzales 267 P. 947 Ariz. 1928
MacDonald v. Perry 255 P. 494 Ariz. 1927
MacDonald v. Perry 255 P. 494 Ariz. 1927
Bruno v. Grande 251 P. 550 Ariz. 1926
Bruno v. Grande 251 P. 550 Ariz. 1926
The next request, the refusal to give which is assigned as error, , 179 Pac.
Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Hudspeth 216 P. 246 Ariz. 1923
Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Hudspeth 216 P. 246 Ariz. 1923
The learned judge, , 179 Pac.
Southern Casualty Co. v. Johnson 207 P. 987 Ariz. 1922
Southern Casualty Co. v. Johnson 207 P. 987 Ariz. 1922