Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite United Verde Copper Co. v. Wiley, 183 P. 737.

32 citing documents.

Waqui v. Tanner Bros. Contracting Co., Inc. 589 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Waqui v. Tanner Bros. Contracting Co., Inc. 589 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
But the yardstick to be applied in determining whether such a , 183 P. 737, 738 , wherein Justice Ross quoted the following rule laid down by Chancellor Kent in Coleman v. Southwick, 9 Johns.
Zadro v. Snyder 464 P.2d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Zadro v. Snyder 464 P.2d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Pumphrey v. Dynek 457 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Pumphrey v. Dynek 457 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
McClain v. Sinclair 410 P.2d 500 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
McClain v. Sinclair 410 P.2d 500 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
The reason for this rule, as stated by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, -529 , 183 P. 737, 738-739 (1919) -409 , 286 P. 371, 372 (1930).
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Parr 391 P.2d 575 Ariz. 1964
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Parr 391 P.2d 575 Ariz. 1964
Waid v. Bergschneider 381 P.2d 568 Ariz. 1963
Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. Montoya 372 P.2d 703 Ariz. 1962
Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. Montoya 372 P.2d 703 Ariz. 1962
But the yardstick to be applied in determining whether such a condition exists is *370 , 183 P. 737, 738 , wherein Justice Ross quoted the following rule laid down by Chancellor Kent in Coleman v. Southwick, 9 Johns, N.Y.
McNelis v. Bruce 367 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1961
McNelis v. Bruce 367 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1961
Stallcup v. Rathbun 258 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1953
Stallcup v. Rathbun 258 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1953
But the yardstick to be applied in determining whether such a , 183 P. 737, 738 , wherein Justice Ross quoted the following rule laid down by Chancellor Kent in Coleman v. Southwick, 9 Johns, N.Y., 45, 6 Am.Dec.
Olsen v. Mading 45 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1935
Olsen v. Mading 45 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1935
Medlock v. Florian 28 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1934
Medlock v. Florian 28 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1934
City of Phoenix v. Mayfield 20 P.2d 296 Ariz. 1933
City of Phoenix v. Mayfield 20 P.2d 296 Ariz. 1933
As to the rule in this jurisdiction, , 183 Pac.
Coppinger v. Broderick 295 P. 780 Ariz. 1931
Coppinger v. Broderick 295 P. 780 Ariz. 1931
City of Phoenix v. Nutt 286 P. 371 Ariz. 1930
City of Phoenix v. Nutt 286 P. 371 Ariz. 1930
The rule for determining such a , 183 Pac.
Hilltop Metals Mining Co. v. Hall 241 P. 35 Ariz. 1925
Hilltop Metals Mining Co. v. Hall 241 P. 35 Ariz. 1925
The reports abound with, decisions adhering to this rule, , 183 Pac.
E. A. Tovrea & Co. v. Yutich 206 P. 595 Ariz. 1922
E. A. Tovrea & Co. v. Yutich 206 P. 595 Ariz. 1922
Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Egich 199 P. 132 Ariz. 1920